This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
bijouxbroussard · F
There are some places where it is. The owner of the property meets with local artists and they come to an agreement. A lot of very moving and beautiful tableaus have resulted from that type of collaboration.
But anonymous, random "tagging" is an entirely different scenario. If it’s being removed, it was done without the consent of the property owner, which makes it [b]vandalism[/b].
If you support the concept of personal property, you’re free to encourage graffiti on anything you [b]own[/b]. Many people would more than willing to provide you with all the "art" you can stand.
But anonymous, random "tagging" is an entirely different scenario. If it’s being removed, it was done without the consent of the property owner, which makes it [b]vandalism[/b].
If you support the concept of personal property, you’re free to encourage graffiti on anything you [b]own[/b]. Many people would more than willing to provide you with all the "art" you can stand.
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment
bijouxbroussard · F
@SW-User They shouldn’t allow that, either. It’s another example of people not respecting private property.
DrWatson · 70-79, M
@SW-User So if dog walkers do one thing that they shouldn't, that justifies other people doing another thing that they shouldn't?