I Caned At School
I have often been asked what it was like to use the cane this both as a father and more as a deputy whose job it was to cane naughty boys in a prep school.
The answer is that it is not easy. With a proper cane designed for the task it is fairly easy with some practice to be able to give it a good swing and land a stinging stroke across the middle of the offenders bottom. The hard part is the mental side of actually lifting the cane and bringing yourself to strike the boys bottom with it. As a boy I was caned many times and knew just how much it hurt, and now the roles were reversed and was about to inflict that indescribable sting across the waiting boys bottom.
Boys will start to cry often just at the thought of they are going to be caned, yet alone bending over waiting for it or the sting it causes. It is very easy at this point to let the offender off, as you feel sorry for him. He knows he has done wrong and you question the need to inflict pain on his bottom. Will it do anything to keep him out of trouble in the future. It may or may not but will make him think before being naughty again. This is why it is pointless just giving him a soft tap on his bottom with the cane, however tempted you may be. It has to be given a good swing and land firmly on the bottom. You also have to do it in a school situation because a member of staff has reported the boy, and the sole aim is so that e gets the cane. You have to support the member of staff, even if feeling it is not really a caning offence, you have to apply it firmly to his bottom the stated number of times, that is listed for that offence. You have to give the stated number of whacks as a deputy, but as a parent you can change it. You have to carry out the caning as the rest of the school expect it. BE he a boy that is hardly ever naughty, a real pest or one that may just have been in the wrong place at the wrong time, his bottom has to be caned firmly. My view did not count.
An example of this was once with my own son who was sent at 4;15 for me to cane him at school. With a group of others was accused of throwing mud around in the hanging room. It was an automatic offence requiring three of the cane. I saw him that night before he had to report after school the following day. I know my son and could tell he was not lying when he said he had not thrown any mud. I told him, that if he felt he was going to be caned for something he did not do he had to follow procedure and appeal to the head, not to me.
I had expected him to do this and was surprised to see him outside my office a 4;15 in his pants, and knowing that as he had been slippered that year, like the other nine boys, he would have to remove pants and bend over for me to cane his bare bottom as hard as the rest. He was not guilty, so may have been some others, but I did not know them so well. THEREFORE it was wrong to use my knowledge of him as his dad to spare him. When it was his turn, he had to remove pants and bend over the chair for three strokes on his bare bottom. It was hard seeing his bottom waiting to be caned and knowing that he had not done the offence and it was my own son. Like it or not., just like the other boys I administered three sharp stokes across his bottom reducing him to tears on the first stroke. It was hard to bring myself to cane his bottom, more so as it was bare. I had caned his bare bottom as a dad many times at home but it was very much more different at school. I could not change the punishment and if I thought he was not guilt at home he would not get it. Here I knew he was not guilty but still had to cane his bottom, made worse by the fact it was bare and the rest watching to make sure he got it as hard as them. I used the same tactic that I used whenever I was going to cane a boy. I just blocked out of my mind who it was bending over the chair and was just another boys bottom waiting t be painful caned. If I thought each time who it was over the chair I would never have been able to cane that boys bare bottom. it just had to be an object that had to be hit with a cane. I talked to my son a few days afterwards and asked why he had not appealed. He said even if it had been a full six he would have taken it. Boys who appeal are teased and if I had been let off it would have been worse as I was your son. The rule is, even if not guilty and are put on report, you just have to take the whacks. I can see his point and while in some cases it may seem you were doing a boy a kindness by not caning him, once he was on report it may have been worse to let him off than to cane his bottom. It did make it easier to cane the bottom, as not to do so, would make itworse for the boy. Once outside my office that bottom had to be whacked. It made it slightly easier but every single time I caned a boys bottom I had a sick feeling as he bent over and I saw his bottom and whacked the cane across it. IT NEVER got easier and on average as a deputy I must have caned at least four boys a week at school for 20 years. That is at the least 3500 bottoms I caned and administered at least 10 500 strokes....it still effected me the same.
If the boy was getting whacked that year for the first time he got it on his pants. I found this emotionally easier to bring the cane down on his pants rather than bare. Even still I had a slightly sick feeling, as I knew even on pants it was going to really sting. The worse was when it was bare. I would have to watch him take his pants off so as to maximise the sting on his bottom. Worse still was when he bent over I saw his bare white cheeks and knew I had to inflict pain on them like nothing one experiences. As a boy I knew just how much that cane hurt on the bare bottom, but in spite of my feelings his bottom had to be caned. The cane always went with a sharper thwaaack on the bare bottom and did make me shudder. Then the crying started and was aware that I had hurt him....sadly that was the intention. As I took the cane off his bottom the red line where he had been hit started to get redder and swell more. I knew from experience that as this took place the sting on his bottom was increasing all the time. It was tempting to tell him to get up and let him off the other strokes. Of course he would have been greatly teased and in spite of not wanting to sting him any more the punishment had to carry on, ofyen on a little bottom that was shaking and twitching from being hit.
It was a hard job, confronted with a boy bending over sticking his bare bottom out to be caned, but having got to that point, be it at home or school, with no leniency the cane had to swish firmly across the waiting bottom. It was harder regardless of age if the boy was tiny and so presented a small little bottom that had to be painfully caned. Boys getting whacked at school for the first time that year wee allowed to keep his pants on and it was not so distressing for me to thwack the cane across his pants rather than on the bare bottom. Both for the boy and myself a caning on pants was not so much of an ordeal as having it bare.
If anybody thinks that their is any pleasure in caning a boys bottom they are either very sick or never had to actually do it. That also goes for the boy that constantly was naughty and escaped the cane somehow, but now was going to get it. I did at times get satisfaction that at last these boys had slipped up and were going to get what they should have had before. I did not however get pleasure in caning these bottoms, and pleasure and satisfaction should not be regarded as the same thing.
The answer is that it is not easy. With a proper cane designed for the task it is fairly easy with some practice to be able to give it a good swing and land a stinging stroke across the middle of the offenders bottom. The hard part is the mental side of actually lifting the cane and bringing yourself to strike the boys bottom with it. As a boy I was caned many times and knew just how much it hurt, and now the roles were reversed and was about to inflict that indescribable sting across the waiting boys bottom.
Boys will start to cry often just at the thought of they are going to be caned, yet alone bending over waiting for it or the sting it causes. It is very easy at this point to let the offender off, as you feel sorry for him. He knows he has done wrong and you question the need to inflict pain on his bottom. Will it do anything to keep him out of trouble in the future. It may or may not but will make him think before being naughty again. This is why it is pointless just giving him a soft tap on his bottom with the cane, however tempted you may be. It has to be given a good swing and land firmly on the bottom. You also have to do it in a school situation because a member of staff has reported the boy, and the sole aim is so that e gets the cane. You have to support the member of staff, even if feeling it is not really a caning offence, you have to apply it firmly to his bottom the stated number of times, that is listed for that offence. You have to give the stated number of whacks as a deputy, but as a parent you can change it. You have to carry out the caning as the rest of the school expect it. BE he a boy that is hardly ever naughty, a real pest or one that may just have been in the wrong place at the wrong time, his bottom has to be caned firmly. My view did not count.
An example of this was once with my own son who was sent at 4;15 for me to cane him at school. With a group of others was accused of throwing mud around in the hanging room. It was an automatic offence requiring three of the cane. I saw him that night before he had to report after school the following day. I know my son and could tell he was not lying when he said he had not thrown any mud. I told him, that if he felt he was going to be caned for something he did not do he had to follow procedure and appeal to the head, not to me.
I had expected him to do this and was surprised to see him outside my office a 4;15 in his pants, and knowing that as he had been slippered that year, like the other nine boys, he would have to remove pants and bend over for me to cane his bare bottom as hard as the rest. He was not guilty, so may have been some others, but I did not know them so well. THEREFORE it was wrong to use my knowledge of him as his dad to spare him. When it was his turn, he had to remove pants and bend over the chair for three strokes on his bare bottom. It was hard seeing his bottom waiting to be caned and knowing that he had not done the offence and it was my own son. Like it or not., just like the other boys I administered three sharp stokes across his bottom reducing him to tears on the first stroke. It was hard to bring myself to cane his bottom, more so as it was bare. I had caned his bare bottom as a dad many times at home but it was very much more different at school. I could not change the punishment and if I thought he was not guilt at home he would not get it. Here I knew he was not guilty but still had to cane his bottom, made worse by the fact it was bare and the rest watching to make sure he got it as hard as them. I used the same tactic that I used whenever I was going to cane a boy. I just blocked out of my mind who it was bending over the chair and was just another boys bottom waiting t be painful caned. If I thought each time who it was over the chair I would never have been able to cane that boys bare bottom. it just had to be an object that had to be hit with a cane. I talked to my son a few days afterwards and asked why he had not appealed. He said even if it had been a full six he would have taken it. Boys who appeal are teased and if I had been let off it would have been worse as I was your son. The rule is, even if not guilty and are put on report, you just have to take the whacks. I can see his point and while in some cases it may seem you were doing a boy a kindness by not caning him, once he was on report it may have been worse to let him off than to cane his bottom. It did make it easier to cane the bottom, as not to do so, would make itworse for the boy. Once outside my office that bottom had to be whacked. It made it slightly easier but every single time I caned a boys bottom I had a sick feeling as he bent over and I saw his bottom and whacked the cane across it. IT NEVER got easier and on average as a deputy I must have caned at least four boys a week at school for 20 years. That is at the least 3500 bottoms I caned and administered at least 10 500 strokes....it still effected me the same.
If the boy was getting whacked that year for the first time he got it on his pants. I found this emotionally easier to bring the cane down on his pants rather than bare. Even still I had a slightly sick feeling, as I knew even on pants it was going to really sting. The worse was when it was bare. I would have to watch him take his pants off so as to maximise the sting on his bottom. Worse still was when he bent over I saw his bare white cheeks and knew I had to inflict pain on them like nothing one experiences. As a boy I knew just how much that cane hurt on the bare bottom, but in spite of my feelings his bottom had to be caned. The cane always went with a sharper thwaaack on the bare bottom and did make me shudder. Then the crying started and was aware that I had hurt him....sadly that was the intention. As I took the cane off his bottom the red line where he had been hit started to get redder and swell more. I knew from experience that as this took place the sting on his bottom was increasing all the time. It was tempting to tell him to get up and let him off the other strokes. Of course he would have been greatly teased and in spite of not wanting to sting him any more the punishment had to carry on, ofyen on a little bottom that was shaking and twitching from being hit.
It was a hard job, confronted with a boy bending over sticking his bare bottom out to be caned, but having got to that point, be it at home or school, with no leniency the cane had to swish firmly across the waiting bottom. It was harder regardless of age if the boy was tiny and so presented a small little bottom that had to be painfully caned. Boys getting whacked at school for the first time that year wee allowed to keep his pants on and it was not so distressing for me to thwack the cane across his pants rather than on the bare bottom. Both for the boy and myself a caning on pants was not so much of an ordeal as having it bare.
If anybody thinks that their is any pleasure in caning a boys bottom they are either very sick or never had to actually do it. That also goes for the boy that constantly was naughty and escaped the cane somehow, but now was going to get it. I did at times get satisfaction that at last these boys had slipped up and were going to get what they should have had before. I did not however get pleasure in caning these bottoms, and pleasure and satisfaction should not be regarded as the same thing.
