This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
SomeMichGuy · M
10 from this view...
helenS · 36-40, F
@SomeMichGuy That picture is more than 3 years old... 😏
SomeMichGuy · M
SomeMichGuy · M
@helenS I'm seeing the pattern of your issue now...CONTEXT.
If you look at the various replies, you'll see that I originally replied on 24 Jan. 2019 (~22 days after the original posting or your own reply).
It bubbled back into my feed because of the other replies this year, and I again offered a positive reply which I have done on various occasions. Some posters appreciate this, and I can't foretell who will come back or when, so having some new, positive feedback is nice to find, upon logging in.
Besides the opportunity to state the obvious, I'm not sure how the reply offended you...?
If you look at the various replies, you'll see that I originally replied on 24 Jan. 2019 (~22 days after the original posting or your own reply).
It bubbled back into my feed because of the other replies this year, and I again offered a positive reply which I have done on various occasions. Some posters appreciate this, and I can't foretell who will come back or when, so having some new, positive feedback is nice to find, upon logging in.
Besides the opportunity to state the obvious, I'm not sure how the reply offended you...?
helenS · 36-40, F
@SomeMichGuy Oh your response didn't offend me at all – I just found it amusing that you replied to a post which is three years old. Sorry it's not been my intention to annoy you.
🌷 <== flower for you!
🌷 <== flower for you!
SomeMichGuy · M
@helenS And still no awareness of context. lol