Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

I Absolutely Hate Liars

Judge rules that Manafort deliberately lied to Mueller’s team during cooperation


Evidence suggests that Paul Manafort deliberately lied to special counsel Robert Mueller’s team after he had agreed to cooperate, a federal judge ruled Wednesday.
After dueling filings and arguments from prosecutors and the defense over the past few months, Judge Amy Berman Jackson sided with Mueller’s team on three of the five areas in which they’d accused Manafort of lying.

Manafort, Donald Trump’s former campaign chair, has already been convicted of financial crimes in Virginia and has pleaded guilty to other charges in Washington. He was not charged with new crimes related to these alleged false statements.
But now, Jackson will take these purported lies during cooperation into account when she sentences Manafort for the DC crimes on March 13 — and they may well spur her to give him a tougher sentence.

The wrangling between Mueller’s and Manafort’s teams about the alleged lies provided a fascinating glimpse into the investigation, revealing both deeper Russian ties and more shady financial behavior from Manafort. We learned that Mueller is claiming:

- That Manafort shared Trump campaign polling data with Konstantin Kilimnik, a longtime associate of his who the FBI thinks has “ties to Russian intelligence” (a Mueller prosecutor said this topic goes “very much to the heart of” their larger investigation)

- That in 2017 and 2018, Manafort worked with Kilimnik to advance to promote a “Ukraine peace plan” (aimed, it seems, at settling the Russia-Ukraine conflict on terms favorable to Russia)

- That $125,000 paid out from a pro-Trump Super PAC to a political media firm during the campaign was later used to help pay Manafort’s legal fees

- That Manafort changed his story about a matter another Justice Department office is investigating — one that seems to involve the Trump campaign or administration


(For more detailed information vox.com)

Any posts not relating to Manafort or Trump will be deleted.
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
HerKing · 61-69, M
What hasn't been explained is if what the campaign and all the circus within were all above board and doing nothing wrong, why have they lied about what they were doing and when they were doing it?
SW-User
[image/video deleted]
@HerKing
windinhishair · 61-69, M
@HerKing it is a valid question. The only reasonable conclusion one can draw is that it wasn't above board. It could even be that the campaign colluded to get approval for the Moscow Trump Tower, believing they wouldn't win and wouldn't have to deliver on any promises made, but would make lots of money after the loss in November 2016.
HerKing · 61-69, M
@windinhishair
It could even be that the campaign colluded to get approval for the Moscow Trump Tower, believing they wouldn't win and wouldn't have to deliver on any promises made, but would make lots of money after the loss in November 2016

Hey, bygones will be bygones. The Russians who went to town and held up their side of the deal will just let it lie and not hold anyone to account who was involved and had told the Russians they'd see about changing policy to suit Putin and the rest of the maf..I mean oligarchs. Nope, no sirree.