Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

I Find Politics Interesting

[b][center][big]Poll: Democratic Women Most Likely to Block or Unfriend Someone over Politics[/big][/center][/b]

Democrats are more likely than Republicans and Independents to block or unfriend someone on social media over politics, according to a nonpartisan survey published Monday from the Public Religion Research Institute (PRRI).
Twenty-four percent of Democrats unfriended or blocked someone on social media because of political posts, according to the survey results. However, only nine percent of Republicans and nine percent of Independents said they did the same.

“Political liberals are also far more likely than conservatives to say they removed someone from their social media circle due to what they shared online (28% vs. 8%, respectively),” PRRI explains of its survey. “Eleven percent of moderates say they blocked, unfollowed, or unfriended someone due to what they posted online.”

The study also found that Democratic women are more likely than Republican women and men from both parties to remove someone from their social media circle over political disagreements.

Thirty percent of female Democrats admitted to removing someone from their social media network, while only eight percent of Republican women admitted to doing the same. Fourteen percent of Democratic men said they did this, while ten percent of Republican men said they unfollowed, unfriended, or blocked someone based on political posts.

The nonpartisan poll questioned 1,004 adults from Dec. 7 to Dec. 11
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
lov2smile · 36-40, F
NW

You silly man....Of course I do not believe in polls....Unless It agrees with me, Haha
Northwest · M
I believe that. Just like you do not accept election results, unless you win.
Northwest · M
Merry Christmas.
lov2smile · 36-40, F
@Northwest:

You said: [i]you do not accept election results[/i]

YIKES!!! Now that's being hypocritical. Hilary brutally criticized Trump because he said he didn't trust the system. (Realizing that dems use dead people names to vote, not to mention illegals voting)

Lo and behold, Hilary loses the election and right away the Hilary camp wants a re-count and starts protesting and "Bribing" the electoral college, promoting riots on and on and you have the temerity to accuse me of not accepting the election results...That's laughable

[b]Tell me again...Why don't liberals want "Voter Id"??[/b]
Northwest · M
@lov2smile: to be exact, Trump said that the system was rigged. After he won, he said it wasn't.

To be more exact, Hillary had nothing to do with the recount, and neither did the DNC, that was all Jill Stein. Not that you would ever be bothered by the truth, or the fact that the Republicans said that there was no fraud. Can you produce a single, credible reference to fraud?

BTW, Trump's harshest criticism, came from the Republican leadership.

But then again, the truth was never your guide here.
lov2smile · 36-40, F
@Northwest:

You said: [i]"recount, and neither did the DNC, that was all Jill Stein".[/i]

Haha, you honestly believe we are so naive to believe this didn't start from the Hilary camp. Honestly, Jill Stein? She had nothing to gain, except the millions of dollars that were fraudulently donated to a recount.

Liberals use to fool us with these types of comments...no more
Northwest · M
@lov2smile: [quote]Haha, you honestly believe we are so naive[/quote]

Why not. You repeat all the lies Trump, and his propaganda machine puts out. That's beside the point though. Not a single source was able to come out, with proof that the Hillary camp had anything to do with the recount.

As to why Stein did it? you need to ask her. The recount itself, where it was permitted, was not fraudulent. It's a technicality, but so is the ascension to the Presidency, of a man, who lost the popular vote by 3M.

Why would liberals try to fool you? that would be a redundancy.
lov2smile · 36-40, F
@Northwest:

You can live with your stats all you want....But the fact of the matter is...
[b]YOU LOST![/b] Get use to it.

Oh, that's right, you weren't running for anything, and I'm so mean.
I'm sure you are happy with your participation trophy. There are no winners and losers in liberal world.
Northwest · M
@lov2smile: OK, just what I thought. When you run out of justifications for your lies, you say "you lost! Get used to it".

And, yes, you would be wrong one more time. I was not running for anything. I am a voter, so yes, you're right on that one.

If you're talking about Hillary, then she won the popular vote by a nearly 3M votes margin over Trump. HE lost the popular vote, get used to it.

PS: Out of the 7 right win, haters, who blocked me on SW, 5 are women. I have not had a single liberal block me for my political views.
lov2smile · 36-40, F
@Northwest:

Well, slowly but surely we find out where the votes for Hilary came from and it is only the tip of the ice berg

[b]California DMV licensed 800,000 undocumented immigrants under 2-year-old law[/b]

Shocking!!!
Northwest · M
@lov2smile: There have many programs, over the years, that provided undocumented aliens with driver licenses. This does not give them the right to vote. So, you're a few decades late with this news, and it has absolutely no bearing on the results.

This, however, is an actual Tweet, from the President Elect, a few hours ago:

Donald J. Trump ‏@realDonaldTrump 7h7 hours ago

Happy New Year to all, including to my many enemies and those who have fought me and lost so badly they just don't know what to do. Love!
jackjjackson · 61-69, M
@Northwest: Mr Trump speaks peace. You lack the ability to think independently. #LOSER
Northwest · M
@Jackjjacksonjr: you're still trolling me?
jackjjackson · 61-69, M
@Northwest:
Jackjjacksonjr
@Northwest: you wish lol sorry I don't behave like you. I was reading my friend's terrific post. F off jacka**
Northwest · M
@Jackjjacksonjr: and yet, you are still trolling, jack....
jackjjackson · 61-69, M
@Northwest: I told you to scram loser. Get a life.
Northwest · M
@Jackjjacksonjr: And yet, you're still the same troll. Nothing of substance, simply a troll.
jackjjackson · 61-69, M
@Northwest: since you don't understand scram let's try get lost.
Northwest · M
@Jackjjacksonjr: It looks like you don't understand what troll means. I did not respond to you, you came in here, not to respond to my post, but to attack me. That's trolling. You're still doing it. You're a man-child.
jackjjackson · 61-69, M
@Northwest: 😇 Let's try beat it. Surely that you understand.
Northwest · M
@Jackjjacksonjr: Sure, I understand. Beating it is about the only thing you're capable of doing.
jackjjackson · 61-69, M
@Northwest: 😇 Boo hoo
lov2smile · 36-40, F
@Northwest:

Geez, don't be so paranoid...Jack was reading MY post and responded to something he disagreed with you on.....

[b]But then again you always have trouble dealing with anyone that disagrees with you.[/b]
jackjjackson · 61-69, M
@Northwest: since you have uninformed sjw written all over you I will spell it out. This wasn't your post. It was an intelligent thought written by a lovely woman. Being a typical uninformed sjw you engage in name calling and other behavior not socially acceptable. If you dint understand this please take it to a qualified therapist and have it translated. Good bye.
jackjjackson · 61-69, M
@lov2smile: "But then again you always have trouble dealing with anyone that disagrees with you" = anyone with an open informed mind 😂
Northwest · M
@lov2smile: [quote]Geez, don't be so paranoid...Jack was reading MY post and responded to something he disagreed with you on....[/quote]

Not really. This is really an unhealthy obsession.



[quote]But then again you always have trouble dealing with anyone that disagrees with you.[/quote]

Assumes facts not in evidence. Perhaps, to enhance your credibility, you can tell us again, about how you spent months, over a period of two years, researching Obamacare, and the evidence you presented, was a years-old, debunked, blog entry, by someone else.