Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »
Top | Newest First | Oldest First
This message was deleted by the author of the main post.
lov2smile · 36-40, F
sighmeupforthat,

I deleted your message due to the vulgar avatar. You are welcome to post the same again without the bad language
lov2smile · 36-40, F
[b]Attention Hillary Supporters:[/b]

Is this what you want for President of the United States of America?
Northwest · M
@lov2smile:

You're throwing the "partisan" label at me? A few days ago, as far as you, and Trump, were concerned, Comey was part of the rigged system, that let Hillary off.

There is no way, the details could be released, because no one knows what this is about. Comey's memo was both mysterious and unprecedented. He had no details, but was getting tired of being accused of collusion.

So, what details? The Clinton campaign, is screamed, for Comey to release the details.

The Trump campaign, and you, are screaming: let them release all of the emails? Really? what about privacy? Huma does not even know what this is about, beyond some vague reference to some email. Only extreme partisans, and those who have no clue, would demand, that a citizen, open up their private records, and their personal lives.

The FBI received a warrant to look for specific things, and since you have no clue, I'll explain what that is. When you send an email, it has "metadata" attached to it. You don't see that data in your email client, but it's there and can be seen when you look at the raw data.

Among other things, the metadata, has a history record, indicating where the IP address of the server sending, or relaying, the email, who sent it, the IP addresses that passed along, etc. It's part of the Internet Protocol.

So, the FBI had a warrant, to look for information, tying Weiner to what could be an illegal interaction, with a minor. This is not a shocker to the Trump group, and supporters, because they're voting for someone, who told a ten year old, that she will be dating him in ten years, and that women should be prepared to have their "kitties", grabbed, when in the presence of a famous person.

Anyhow, I digress, the FBI found some metadata, indicating, that Huma may have used that computer as well, but not for the same purpose as her husband's. So, they want to look at any emails, that MAY have been relayed through the Clinton server, and see if they're not part of the email set, they've already looked at.

Vague enough for you? When you're on a fishing trip, it's stupid to send out a memo, declaring that you're, once more, on hot pursuit of the Lock Ness Monster.

If the FBI cannot release details during the investigation, then why did they release anything at all. Read my previous paragraph.
lov2smile · 36-40, F
@Northwest:

Sounds like you are running for the tall grass now!!! LOL
This is bad for Hillary and you know it!
Northwest · M
@lov2smile: Always ready with the hyperbole, just like Trump. The FBI director has not seen the materials, he has not, but he declared it the biggest thing since Watergate. The FBI has a responsibility to the people, to release the details, then everyone will actually know what we're talking about.

 
Post Comment