Remove Ads Get VIP
Similar Worlds

I Find Politics Interesting

Notifications: · Newest First
[b][center][big]Hillary only has herself to blame for the mess she’s in[/big][/center][/b]
By Michael Goodwin October 29, 2016 | 10:15pm | New York Post

[i](This reads like a crime family novel....[b]Maybe call it The GodFather Again[/b])[/i]

The Clinton's can’t help themselves. [b]They are corrupt and corrupters, the ­Typhoid Mary of politics.[/b]

Whether by nature or nurture, they are programmed to ruin. Friends, allies, institutions — all are stained by their touch.

And always, [b]the Clintons blame somebody else. Now it’s FBI Director James Comey’s turn to embody their all-purpose bogeyman, the vast right-wing conspiracy. Somebody, sometimes everybody, is out to get them, unfairly of course.[/b]

[b]The victim card is a Clinton family heirloom, but there are major problems playing it over Comey’s sudden reopening of the e-mail probe.[/b]

[b]Clinton created the mess with her incredibly stupid decision to use a private server as secretary of state. Virtually every major issue dogging her, including her reputation for chronic dishonesty, was started or exacerbated by that decision, including the current one.[/b]

Even as her top aides remain mystified about why she did it, the result fits the family pattern now that Huma Abedin, her most loyal “body” person, is on the hook. It was, by all accounts, the FBI’s criminal investigation into Abedin’s pervy husband, Anthony Weiner, that led to the new cache of suspect e-mails found on a computer the couple shared.

Still, Clinton is understandably panicked because the timing of Comey’s announcement could cost her the election. Her demand that he release everything immediately is also understandable, even as [b]she knows it is impossible for him to release potential evidence before it is examined.[/b]

Her attacks on him play well to her base, and her media handmaidens are amplifying the complaint that he has gone rogue. But, as usual, there is less than meets the eye here, for [b][u]Clinton could solve the problem herself without Comey doing anything to help.[/u][/b]

[b]She could simply order Abedin to hold a press conference and answer any and every question about the newest batch of e-mails. Let reporters ask Abedin directly: What’s in those e-mails? Did any contain classified material?[/b]

[b]Why didn’t you turn that computer over to the FBI during its initial investigation? Did you lie to the FBI about having work-related e-mails on it?[/b]

Also, did Weiner have access to classified material? Was the computer ever hacked?

The potential upside is huge. If Abedin can answer “no” to all the key questions about classified material and her own conduct, Clinton could credibly declare Comey’s announcement much ado about nothing.

She could even hold her own press conference to answer questions and conclude by saying: We have been as transparent as we can be, and we are not afraid of a new investigation because we have nothing to hide.

[b]Hillary won’t do any of that because the potential downside is also huge. My guess is she fears the worst, and may secretly subscribe to the idea that Comey wouldn’t have acted in such a bold and controversial way without some conviction that he had stumbled on a potential bombshell.[/b]

And Clinton, a former litigator used to playing defense, probably already knows what’s in the e-mails. Or perhaps she has concluded that, if indeed there are thousands of them, as is being reported, at least some are bound to re-fuel suspicions that she and her team are guilty of mishandling national secrets.

[b]Then, instead of putting the issue to bed, any substantive discussion, including an Abedin press conference, would actually fan the fire just as voters are going to the polls[/b].

Moreover, even if Abedin’s answers would help Clinton, taking her public would be effectively betting the presidency on her performance. Abedin’s always worked behind the scenes, and has little experience in front of a camera, not to mention a forest of them that would assemble for such an extraordinary event.

What if Abedin were to stumble or crack in public? What if she has a lawyer who advises her to say nothing because she might also be a federal target and risks incriminating herself by speaking publicly?

[b]All of which points to Clinton’s most likely strategy: say nothing while trying to make the issue about Comey’s unorthodox move. A hint of it came Friday evening in her first public reaction[/b].

[b]After falsely accusing him of sending his congressional letter only to Republicans — congressional Democrats also got it — Clinton dodged a direct question about whether she had spoken to Abedin. Instead of saying yes or no, she avoided it entirely.[/b]

We’re likely to see more of those headlines in coming days. It’s the [b]Clinton way, where truth is always the enemy.[/b]
31-35, F
+ 4 7 replies 17 views Oct 30, 2016 |
lov2smile · 31-35, F
[b]Attention Hillary Supporters:[/b]

Is this what you want for President of the United States of America?
Northwest · M

You're throwing the "partisan" label at me? A few days ago, as far as you, and Trump, were concerned, Comey was part of the rigged system, that let Hillary off.

There is no way, the details could be released, because no one knows what this is about. Comey's memo was both mysterious and unprecedented. He had no details, but was getting tired of being accused of collusion.

So, what details? The Clinton campaign, is screamed, for Comey to release the details.

The Trump campaign, and you, are screaming: let them release all of the emails? Really? what about privacy? Huma does not even know what this is about, beyond some vague reference to some email. Only extreme partisans, and those who have no clue, would demand, that a citizen, open up their private records, and their personal lives.

The FBI received a warrant to look for specific things, and since you have no clue, I'll explain what that is. When you send an email, it has "metadata" attached to it. You don't see that data in your email client, but it's there and can be seen when you look at the raw data.

Among other things, the metadata, has a history record, indicating where the IP address of the server sending, or relaying, the email, who sent it, the IP addresses that passed along, etc. It's part of the Internet Protocol.

So, the FBI had a warrant, to look for information, tying Weiner to what could be an illegal interaction, with a minor. This is not a shocker to the Trump group, and supporters, because they're voting for someone, who told a ten year old, that she will be dating him in ten years, and that women should be prepared to have their "kitties", grabbed, when in the presence of a famous person.

Anyhow, I digress, the FBI found some metadata, indicating, that Huma may have used that computer as well, but not for the same purpose as her husband's. So, they want to look at any emails, that MAY have been relayed through the Clinton server, and see if they're not part of the email set, they've already looked at.

Vague enough for you? When you're on a fishing trip, it's stupid to send out a memo, declaring that you're, once more, on hot pursuit of the Lock Ness Monster.

If the FBI cannot release details during the investigation, then why did they release anything at all. Read my previous paragraph.
lov2smile · 31-35, F

Sounds like you are running for the tall grass now!!! LOL
This is bad for Hillary and you know it!
Northwest · M
@lov2smile: Always ready with the hyperbole, just like Trump. The FBI director has not seen the materials, he has not, but he declared it the biggest thing since Watergate. The FBI has a responsibility to the people, to release the details, then everyone will actually know what we're talking about.
This message was deleted by the author of the main post.
lov2smile · 31-35, F

I deleted your message due to the vulgar avatar. You are welcome to post the same again without the bad language

Write a comment...
Post Comment  
80 people following
I Find Politics Interesting
Personal Stories, Advice, and Support
New Post
Updated: 10 mths ago
Content Rating: Non-Adult
Group Members Report Group
Hillary only has herself to blame for the mess she... | I Find Politics Interesting | Similar Worlds