Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

I Don't Watch Much Television

It would be an exaggeration to say I watch no TV, because I'll perhaps put on the quiz show 'Only Connect', if it's on - and I got a box set of The Wire for Christmas. (On the other hand that dates from 2008 at the latest, so it hardly counts as contemporary).

I'm wary of writing something that makes me sound like a miserable old woman, or a terrible snob - but the truth of the matter is that there absolutely nothing but unending, miserable, crap, on television, today. And when it's not miserable, it's so patronising as to be offensive (looking at you, whoever
cast,produced and directed this year's Royal Institution Christmas Lectures). So, there's little on to entice me.

Well that's not true, because one can usually count on high-number channels to have a repeat of some grisly and marginally-entertaining murder mystery, or occasionally, comedy, or perhaps if we're lucky, David Attenborough might be making an appearance. But these often date from before I was born. When the best thing on any television channel is an episode of Dad's Army from 1971, the medium clearly has a few problems somewhere along the line.

The world shouldn't be run purely for my benefit, of course, but it also shouldn't be beyond the wit of man to create a few programs which are intellectually rigorous but not snobby, and entertaining without being pandering,

The few 'new' programs I do watch - and it's come even to include news programmes now - are in no way sufficiently interesting, thoughtful, witty, or produced in a way that I care remotely about any kind of outcome, that I remotely miss something I've not seen.

I don't know if it's because British (and other) media companies are more concerned with signalling their immense virtue by emphasising diversity of casts and presenters over their abilities, a lack of imagination, a lack of confidence, an aversion to risk-taking, or something else, or a combination of these. But if it wasn't for the fact that (some) BBC radio is worth the License Fee all by itself, I'd certainly not pay to have a television.

Edit: In fairness, majoring sporting events like the Olympics, some tennis, other athletics, occasionally international football or rugby, or the Boat Race (the last will probably mean nothing to people from outside the UK lol), continue to attract my attention.
Claudianovotny · 36-40, F
Are you as irritated as I am by docuseries where each episode feels the need to repeat what has already been said in the previous one? And then there are long, atmospheric sequences that have little to do with the subject. Or you have more time dedicated to people with fringe theories than to the real substance (Pompeii - the latest dig, second episode). I have to say, though, I took my niece to see the recording of Sue Black's Royal Institution Lecture and that was well done.
I watch one show and that's it. Shameless 😬 Paying 80$ a month to watch one show...smdh
wuiop2 · 41-45
I couldn't agree more, and I particularly appreciate your eloquence.
Savannahh · 18-21, F
I don’t watch much TV either, my parents keep it locked inside the cabinet most times
amrit19901990 · 31-35, M
i stopped watching tv 10 years ago.. i just watch movies on laptop now..
SW-User
Wire was a great series . My al time fav is the sopranos ! 😊
jackson55 · M
I watch little to no network tv. I don't have cable. My tv is mostly for movies.
Murmurs · 31-35, F
@jackson55 I don't think you're missing a huge amount!
jackson55 · M
@Murmurs I don't think so either. When I had cable I liked Discovery and Velosity, animal planet. Stuff like that. $100 a month to watch tv? No thanks. I stream what little tv I watch now.
DDonde · 31-35, M
I don't know much about British TV, but I really can't stand watching TV over here myself. I'm not sure it was that much better in the past either, tbh. For me it's more that there's more enjoyable alternatives (for me) with fewer ads.
Murmurs · 31-35, F
@DDonde I didn't want to criticise American TV (assuming that's where you are!), but since you bring it up, to compare - in my experience from visiting, the US' average is worse, but there's also a lot more of it, so there is a slightly higher possibility of finding something you actually care about....if you can find it! Whereas in the UK, even on non-BBC channels, there are far fewer ads. Either way...there seem to be better options elsewhere
DDonde · 31-35, M
@Murmurs I won't defend American cable TV lol. It's bad, expensive, and full of ads. It's the *only* service around that I can think of where you pay a lot of money and still get bombarded with ads.
Murmurs · 31-35, F
@DDonde I think it's what annoys me too; if you're getting something for 'free', then advertising seems a reasonable price to pay. If you're forking over considerable sums of money the least that could be done is tone down adverts (or at least restrict them to between shows, though I appreciate that's when everyone goes to make a cup of tea or make room for one so there'd be no point!).

 
Post Comment