Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Oldness and prettiness are bound up together

A modern building can certainly be striking and intriguing, whether a new skyscraper or the Basílica de la Sagrada Família. But [i]pretty[/i]?

I was lucky enough to spend 3 years of my life here (indeed a dormer window into my second-year bedroom is just visible top-left!). Not that striking. Not, as such things go in that city, all that unusual. But its prettiness is inherently bound up in its age, dating from around 1480.

A master-mason - today we'd call him an architect - designed the original buildings here (the attic windows, the crenelations, and the statue in the niche above the large tower-room window, are later), but whoever he was, he wasn't interested in advertising his name to the world, merely to do a good job, further secure his reputation, and move on to whatever his next commission might be, continuing to earn his honest living.

That's not what big-name architects of today are after. When the design of your building, the completion of your commission, is about [i]fame[/i], about [i]awards[/i], about [i]revolutionary ideas[/i], something wonderful in the organic nature of traditional architecture is lost. Architecture with awards, funded more by money than by common sense, is, fair enough, inherently not old, but nor is it remotely pretty.

I said, that the the tower id [i]not that striking[/i], but the other side of this tower, facing the street, was in 1646 indeed stuck - by a cannonball! - during a siege in the English Civil War (the ball, much polished by the hands of generations of students, remains in the library to this day).

And it's the fact that with age come absurd parochial anecdotes like that, that old buildings are always pretty.

Perhaps, in 550 years', the Burj Khalifa will carry the same beautiful weight of history.

But somehow, even if it's still standing, I doubt it.
Dancingxghost · 36-40, M
I think it's the materials that gives architecture it's warmth and beauty, wood and stone makes it cozy and gives it a mysterious feel to it, steel and glass it's cold and dead empty without a natural feeling.
EuphoricTurtle · 41-45, M
I think there is also the distinct possibility that whoever commisions a building from a famous architect wants/demands it to be award winning and include revolutionary ideas.

Does Gucci sell t-shirts with their name plastered in gold because they want people to advertise them or is it because the type of people that buy Gucci t-shirts demand that everyone they cross paths in the street with know that they HAVE a Gucci t-shirt?
Persephonee · 22-25, F
@EuphoricTurtle Not merely a distinct possibility but the reality! :( - including the more modern buildings commissioned by the owners of the above!
My goodness! That is a most lovely building. And you lived in it? Within its walls? Wow. You were fortunate. I bet it is still alive and functioning. Built to last.
Persephonee · 22-25, F
@PoetryNEmotion I think the current outbreak of plague might be messing around with it a bit - but it can't be worse than during the Civil War when the college was transformed into a house for the French ambassador!
@Persephonee Stones are not affected by viruses. Only people are. I love history especially in old buildings. My mom's farmhouse was over 300 years old. A grand old building!
RubySoo · 56-60, F
Its a beautiful building.
May i ask where it is?
Persephonee · 22-25, F
@RubySoo the Front Quad of St John's College, Oxford
RubySoo · 56-60, F
@Persephonee oh wonderful.
I visited Oxford very briefly many years ago. Many beautiful buildings.
RubySoo · 56-60, F
It reminds me of a hotel ive visited near Blackburn. [image deleted]
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
vetguy1991 · 51-55, M
very interesting

 
Post Comment