Caring
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

I Love Albert Camus

[b][u]The Plague - Albert Camus[/u][/b] (1947)

After a series of events, doctor Rieux and an older collegue discuss what might have causes several patients to die in a short periode of time. The older doctor mentions that it's the "plague" because he recognises the symptoms from an older case that he was involved in. And then the writer treats you to this passage:


[quote][i]The word "plague" had just been uttered for the first time. At this stage of the narrative, with Dr. Bernard Rieux standing at his window, the narrator may, perhaps, be allowed to justify the doctor's uncertainty and surprise, since, with very slight differences, his reaction was the same as that of the great majority of our townsfolk. Everybody knows that pestilences have a way of recurring in the world; yet somehow we find it hard to believe in ones that crash down on our heads from a blue sky. There have been as many plagues as wars in history; yet always plagues and wars take people equally by surprise.

In fact, like our fellow citizens, Rieux was caught off his guard, and we should understand his hesitations in the light of this fact; and similarly understand how he was torn between conflicting fears and confidence. When a war breaks out, people say: "It's too stupid; it can't last long." But though a war may well be "too stupid," that doesn't prevent its lasting. Stupidity has a knack of getting its way; as we should see if we were not always so much wrapped up in ourselves.

In this respect our townsfolk were like everybody else, wrapped up in themselves; in other words they were humanists: they disbelieved in pestilences.

A pestilence isn't a thing made to man's measure; therefore we tell ourselves that pestilence is a mere bogy of the mind, a bad dream that will pass away. But it doesn't always pass away and, from one bad dream to another, it is men who pass away, and the humanists first of all, because they haven't taken their precautions.

Our townsfolk were not more to blame than others; they forgot to be modest, that was all, and thought that everything still was possible for them; which presupposed that pestilences were impossible. They went on doing business, arranged for journeys, and formed views. How should they have given a thought to anything like plague, which rules out any future, cancels journeys, silences the exchange of views. They fancied themselves free, and no one will ever be free so long as there are pestilences.[/i][/quote]

This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
Moonpenny · F
A brilliant writer and thought-provoking in these times.

I studied Camus at school, La Chute, but I wasn't in a place at the time to fully appreciate his nihilistic style. And I'm not sure I could read his work right now.

Thanks for posting.
Kwek00 · 41-45, M
@Moonpenny He's not really a nihilist, for as far as I understand him. I said yesterday that I never read a book from him from cover to cover. I did read parts of his book "the rebel". But he goes beyond nihilism right? He believes that in a nihilistic world people search for some excistential meaning. He still believes in purpose, altough purpose needs to be filled in by the individual, or is imposed by the culture the individual grew up in.

I just started reading this book. The dutch translation seems to be really good too, since it reads like a train. But this passage was something that I thought was worth sharing.
Moonpenny · F
@Kwek00 Well, Camus is the father of Absurdism, stemming from Existentialism. Absurdism and Nihilism have similar features and I did say....'nihilistic style' which also probably reflected the way I was feeling at the time.
Yes, he does go beyond Nihilism and purpose for the individual is paramount.
Kwek00 · 41-45, M
@Moonpenny Do you know the answer to Sssslms' question... cause I'm curious about that too?
SmartKat · 56-60, F
@Kwek00 When I took French in college, I read L’Etranger (in French) and wrote an essay about it (in French.) I still remember how I started off the essay:
“C’est l’histoire d’un jeune homme désagréable s’appelle Meursault.”
Moonpenny · F
@SmartKat Ha ha, funny what you remember. I remember a totally useless quotation I learnt from a German text 😄
Moonpenny · F
@Kwek00 I think you answered Sssslm's question more than adequately.
I don't profess to understand philosophy in depth but have checked the definitions of Humanism and pestilence. All I can quote, which makes a semblance of sense to me, and without rambling on about something I know nothing about, is that....
"The victims of the plague do not believe in the foreshadowing disaster because it contradicts their 'humanism': their ideological beliefs and expectations." (As clear as mud!)

So, from this do we assume that those going about their daily lives, regardless of anyone else, have a higher risk of catching the current 'pestilence' and take the rest of us with them? 🤷🏼‍♀️