I Am An Mra

Of course you would claim that feminists had nothing to do with this bill. It reeks of bigotry and violations of the accused rights to a fare trial. Obviously you would want to distance yourself from this bill but the problem is that it has feminism written all over it. Here is just one example.
" A comprehensive prevention program shall include a range of prevention strategies, including, but not limited to, women’s empowerment programming, awareness raising campaigns, primary prevention, bystander intervention, and risk reduction.
We have seen all this before. This is pure feminism.
Women's empowerment programming:
Here is a bill about rape that forces universities to develop women empowerment programs. Rape a crime committed by both men and women against both men and women yet only women are mentioned when it comes to needing courage to step forward and report it.
Awareness raising:
We seen this before. This is how feminist promote thief ideology. They go around and plaster the campus with bigoted posters like the "don't be that guy" poster campaign and lies like the 1 in 4 myth.

Primary prevention:
Like the "she fears you" lecture that all boys must sit tthrough at some universities. It teaches these men that all women fear them and rightfully so because men do bad things.

Bystander intervention:
Like the white ribbon campaign. This teaches men to "man up" and do your job as the protector of women. "Put yourself in harms way to protect people born with vaginas because that is your job. You were born with a penis therefore you are to be the imitators and obsorbers of violence on behalf of anyone who was born with a vagina."

Risk reduction:
Teach men not to rape campaigns.

All of the programs I mentioned above are feminist programs. They were written by feminists using feminist dogma. They are operated and run by people who openly admit to being feminists and this bill facilitates their presence on college campuses. If this bill is passed these feminist organizations will be required on college campuses in California.

Lady blue insists that feminist had nothing to do with this. Ha.

Look for more on ladyblu later.

There are lots more female victims of rape than there are male victims. There are lots more male rapists than female rapists. I suppose those stats are down to feminists as well? If you want to stop rapes happening men need to know exactly what rape is. Apologists like you are prepared to argue on definitions so that rapists get a better deal. You are a sick fucker trying to come across as a normal guy. Everyone on EP sees through your shit.

The bill is talking about people who are using as a defence the fact that the victim gave consent. It is not talking about all people charged with rape or sexual assault. You don't really understand the legal definitions too well do you Jack? In order to use the defence of consent, you clearly would need to prove that verbal consent was given.

But she was making eyes at me your honour.......!!!

Yet again a rape apologist in action. Funny how you want to make it harder for the Courts to convict rapists, isn't it Jack. Something to hide?

In cases where the people has sex, how would a person go about proving that the sex was consensual (not rape) without proving they got consent?

I have a problem with the accused having to prove his or her innocence. Its called presumption of innocence and is the foundation of our entire legal system. The burden of proof is on the accuser not the accused.

The way to prove sex was consensual is to get both participants to agree that.

Simple enough for you?

If one disagrees then the other has to provide proof. If it goes before a jury they get to decide. If it is one person's word against another it is highly unlikely to see the inside of a court room. The burden of proof, as you rightly state, is on the accuser, not the accused. Nothing has changed at all.

If the accused wishes to use the defence of consent, then the onus is on him to prove that he obtained consent. What's wrong with that?

How do you prove that you gained consent in a court of law. Men have been convicted based on nothing but the accusers word. Brian Banks in one such example.

You prove you gained consent by giving evidence.

How does anyone disprove it?

Again, by giving evidence.

That's what Courts are for.

Idiot.

Brian Banks put himself in prison by pleading guilty.
"
In the summer of 2002, Banks was arrested and charged after classmate Wanetta Gibson said that he dragged her into a stairway at Polytechnic High School (Poly) and raped her. Faced with a possible 41 years to life sentence, he accepted a plea deal that included five years in prison, five years of probation, and registering as a sex offender."

If he was innocent, why did he plead guilty?

"Men have been convicted based on nothing but the accusers word."

Brian Banks pleady guilty himself. He convicted himself. Why would an innocent man do that?

Funny how Jack didn't respond to my demolition of his statement, isn't it?

Care to apologise for being wrong yet again?

yea so little time ....since you spend all your time on e/p and not with ur family ! odd that you claim mra are for family !! when u don't even like ur family!!!


you who believes women are only good for raping and has borderline trendies of being a pedophile .