JB wrote: "This is achieved by presenting the public with examples of feminist dogma, thinking and actions plus presenting the public with the types of legislation feminists have pushed through our government. Example is the current bill being discussed in California. This bill if it becomes law would require anyone accused of rape to present proof that they got consent there by shifting the burden of proof from the accuser to the accused."
my response: Wrong once again JB. You really need to do research and understand what you read before writing the things that you do, because by constantly getting things wrong makes you look like an idiot or a bullshitter.
Here is the basis of the Bill. http://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=201320140SB967
It doesn't "require anyone accused of rape to present proof that they got consent there by shifting the burden of proof from the accuser to the accused." as you are claiming, and feminists aren't the ones who came up with it (the dumb MRAs always blame laws they don't like on feminists regardless of whether or not they actually know that feminists are the ones who actually wrote the laws, voted for them, and mandated them. All this bill does is require that educational boards instruct those who want to engage in sexual activity (both males and females) that it is their responsibility to ensure that he or she has the consent of the other person to engage in the sexual activity. There is nothing in the law that indicates that if they fail to do so they will be accused of rape, and the burden of proof will be shifted "from the accuser to the accused" as he claims.
