Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE 禄

Did you know that before world war 2 people were speculating that we could active a 4 hour workday at 5 days a week?

How much would it change your life if full time employment was 20 hours a week and paid similarly to what a 40 hour week does now?
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
ViciDraco36-40, M
@Greenbare i think flexibility in how those hours are worked are important. A lot of people would benefit more from three 7 hour days or two ten hour days. Some creative pursuits would do well under multiple shorter days.

I know I can have extremely productive short days in my current career. But keeping focused over a long day gets hard to stay focused and I lose a lot of efficiency.

A less intellectually demanding job I would probably favor fewer, longer days.
NimbusM
If there were an extra 20 hours per week many would just fill it being online!
NimbusM
@Riverman Might get a few more to join SW ;)
@Nimbus 馃槰馃槹馃槺
NimbusM
@puck61 馃啋
dumpstermeow41-45, F
I'd never get the work I need to do done in 4 hours.
ViciDraco36-40, M
@dumpstermeow not really. It relies on more technological automation and better access to education. We have a lot of BS jobs robots can do. We have a lot of non BS jobs robots will be doing in twenty or thirty years anyways. If those displaced workers had free access to education to develop the skills the robots aren't so good at, we'd have plenty of workers.

We're already looking at underemployment. Don't let the low unemployment fool you. Lot of people are struggling to get even 30 hour work weeks in unskilled areas of the economy. And the reserve workforce, those unemployed but not actively seeking, is still large enough that wages are not yet rising under pressure.

Yes, a lot of things would have to change in order to utilize the work force we do have. But we do have it.
dumpstermeow41-45, F
@ViciDraco we're constantly interviewing and can't find qualified candidates. These robot workers seem ideal.
ViciDraco36-40, M
@dumpstermeow I welcome our robot overlords. I really believe having machines do more of the work is better. We just need policy to serve a society where people are not as tied to work.
Non sustainable. Unrealistic. A work day has to be at least eight hours to keep the old machine running competitively. Sunrise-breakfast -work-lunch-work-sunset-dinner-sleep. Daylight is for working. There will be plenty of down time when we are dead! *Hands on bullwhip*
cherokeepatti61-69, F
It would have been wonderful when I was working, less child care and more time to get chores at home done without being exhausted, free time to enjoy my day.
ViciDraco36-40, M
@cherokeepatti with the cost of childcare these days and parents having to constantly be out working, it would change the current parenting relationship completely. People actually being home for their children and not too exhausted from work to actually do things with them? Imagine!
Elegy46-50
Something doesn't seem right. I thought before WWI we were at 5 and a half day work weeks. that seems like a really short time for a mostly industrial nation to think they could go to 20 hour work weeks.
ViciDraco36-40, M
@Elegy people were tracking productivity increasing with technology and also assuming a model where we produced more durable goods rather than goods designed to fail over time like we have now. It was also around the time labor was making big inroads into worker's rights and shortened work weeks were still fresh in memory as recent accomplishments that could be taken further.

A lot of the people who believed these things were labeled Communists after the war and their movement marginalized and forgotten as a result.
Virgo7961-69, M
Wouldn't have a job if it was only those hours, place would close
DDonde31-35, M
I would be happier and have more time for working on my creative hobbies and other pursuits.

 
Post Comment