Top | Newest First | Oldest First
MasterLee · 56-60, M
How about intraspecial homosexual transgender lesbian incest dwarf cowboy phonesex?
View 2 more replies »
Troy123 · 22-25, M
It was a joke.
xixgun · M
It’s an abuse of power ( and it’s just fucking gross).
No morality play here, it’s just fucking gross.
No morality play here, it’s just fucking gross.
This comment is hidden.
Show Comment
Troy123 · 22-25, M
Because a son and father fucking is, well, just... 😵😨😫
ianR0ckwell · M
Things get weird when each person does what is right in his own eyes
MasterLee · 56-60, M
@ianR0ckwell right even
SW-User
Who said it's bad?
MasterLee · 56-60, M
@SW-User trump
SW-User
ViciDraco · 36-40, M
I'm more of a moral objectivist. That morality is driven from whatever causes the least suffering to other people. Whether we can successfully identify moral behavior with information at hand is a different matter.
In this case, the birth defect risk of incest could harm a child born from it. Thus the moral quandary.
Homosexual sex, producing no children, is thus not immoral as there is none to suffer the choice between consenting adults.
One could argue for equality of standards across different types of sexual groupings based on the notion that if incest was normalized for homosexuals, society would in turn feel more accommodating to heterosexual incest and thus make it more prevalent.
In this case, the birth defect risk of incest could harm a child born from it. Thus the moral quandary.
Homosexual sex, producing no children, is thus not immoral as there is none to suffer the choice between consenting adults.
One could argue for equality of standards across different types of sexual groupings based on the notion that if incest was normalized for homosexuals, society would in turn feel more accommodating to heterosexual incest and thus make it more prevalent.
SW-User
ViciDraco · 36-40, M
@SW-User I am saying it is only immoral if those consequences impose more suffering upon others than other choices would. Everything has consequences.
If nobody is being harmed, why would it be immoral?
If nobody is being harmed, why would it be immoral?
[image deleted]