Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Do people have a right to believe anything they want, even if that belief is dangerous?

I read an interesting article this morning in which the author posits that we don't have the right to believe whatever we want to believe if those beliefs fly in the face of facts ("The earth is flat!") or are morally repugnant ("Ethnic cleansing is a reasonable political solution."). What are your thoughts on the issue?

https://aeon.co/ideas/you-dont-have-a-right-to-believe-whatever-you-want-to
fazer1k · 56-60, M
That's an interesting article. I don't see how we can change what people believe, but we can stop allowing freedom of speech to protect those who voice dangerous beliefs, hatred, incitement of violence etc. Europe already does this, to some extent.

Another factor lies in determining what exactly constitutes evidence for belief. While one camp thinks they have any evidence, however ridiculous it may seem to others, the belief will seem valid to them. That much is evident on SW.

It is not realistic to force people to change their beliefs. What we can do is punish those who act on or promote certain dangerous beliefs.
SmartKat · 56-60, F
You can’t physically get inside their brain and know for sure what they really believe, though.

That’s why I question the whole concept of religious conversions. Nobody except the person themself is ever going to know for sure what he REALLY thinks.

What if you thought you were a member of a church, and somehow you became able to read minds; and you discovered that nobody in your church actually believed. What would that do to your religion?
SW-User
Many religious or superstitious beliefs are dangerous yet people believe in them
xSharp · 31-35, M
rights exist only if there are people willing to dispose of those who infringe upon them but with laws criminalizing victims and allowing criminals to sue should they injure themselves while trespassing on property im inclined to say that the only rights are those you can enforce yourself, for yourself and for those you care about.

thats how rome was able to hand out rights to whomever they felt was worthy of them, by trampling the perceived rights of other peoples and subjugating them with the promise of the "right" to less subjugation should they play along and work towards the betterment of the conquering empire from a far away land, usually by giving up their children as tributes,

but should those children survive their 30 year service they would have MUCH better lives than they would have had if they had stayed living in savage tribes so there were both ups and downs to having romans rights forced on you through physical force and threat of slow death.
Miram · 31-35, F
Just because I do not believe the same, it doesn't mean I have the right to castigate those that do or ban there beliefs.

There isn't much you can do to change their beliefs without their willingness. Dangerous beliefs are those that have ramifications in reality. There are laws against that already.
SW-User
You have a right to believe anything no matter how illogical or ill informed, but you must be prepared to have those beliefs challenged.
Well you can’t stop people from believing in something and unless you act violently on those beliefs, I believe there should be no regulations on expressing your thoughts.
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
SW-User
I'd like to be free to believe whatever I want
but I have a responsibility to other people
StokedFox · 36-40, F
Honestly, can you stop them, no.
This message was deleted by its author.
xSharp · 31-35, M
@iamBen what about the right to rewrite the law? lol then legal rights dont really matter, they are there just for show, like the recycling bins at home depot lol.

if one has the power to resist the law with force (legal or otherwise) then the law does not apply to them, and the law is not some indestructible object, it cannot stop anything physical it can only punish, it cannot protect through any other means than as a deter ant
This message was deleted by its author.
xSharp · 31-35, M
@iamBen these days laws are open to interpretation and are so vague (at least here in canada) in description that they can and do make up rules as they go case to case.

"If a law is unjust, a man is not only right to disobey it, he is obligated to do so."

 
Post Comment