Politics
No Notifications
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE 禄

Donald Trump is going to court. Is anyone surprised?

GohantheThird
M
51 replies 66 views Feb 9, 2017
Share Link
Top | Newest First | Oldest First
Underconstruction 路 F
He wishes he could have a Trump Court the way he had a Trump University !!

LMAO !!
+ 7 路 Reply 路 Translate 路 Feb 9, 2017
TexChik 路 F
Is anyone surprised that lib activist judges violated the constitution because the SCOTUS isn't at full strength ?
+ 3 路 Reply 路 Translate 路 Feb 9, 2017
GohantheThird 路 M
@TexChik: bye bye, sweetheart.
+ 0 路 Reply 路 Translate 路 Feb 12, 2017
TexChik 路 F
@XamadtheFirst: c ya prick.... that's pretentious prick isn't it? Sorry
+ 0 路 Reply 路 Translate 路 Feb 12, 2017 路 Edited: 7 yrs ago
GohantheThird 路 M
@TexChik: Gotta have the last word, don't you sweetheart?
+ 0 路 Reply 路 Translate 路 Feb 12, 2017
peachykeen 路 F
Trump has [u]several[/u] pending cases sitting on dockets in federal and state courts across the country.
+ 5 路 Reply 路 Translate 路 Feb 9, 2017
TheOneyouwerewarnedabout 路 41-45, MVIP
I have no reactionary response.. So here's the latest trendy haircut
[image deleted]
+ 4 路 Reply 路 Translate 路 Feb 9, 2017
NigelDoes 路 56-60, M
That's a look that needs to stick around for while.馃憤
+ 3 路 Reply 路 Translate 路 Feb 9, 2017
MayaFromCalifornia 路 18-21, F
Who pays his lawyers?
+ 2 路 Reply 路 Translate 路 Feb 9, 2017
Sicarium 路 46-50, M
@MayaFromCalifornia: A leftist judge ruled against the travel ban. It's going to work it's way through the courts. And yes, it'll be a waste of time. But the process is the process.
+ 1 路 Reply 路 Translate 路 Feb 9, 2017
MayaFromCalifornia 路 18-21, F
@Sicarium: Didn't another court say he lost? It is a waste of time.
+ 1 路 Reply 路 Translate 路 Feb 9, 2017 路 Edited: 7 yrs ago
GohantheThird 路 M
@MayaFromCalifornia: Yeah, but Trump is technically within his authority so he can argue it. Won't go through, but he'll do it anyway.
+ 2 路 Reply 路 Translate 路 Feb 9, 2017
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
PervertedPrincessOfDeath 路 26-30, T
Well that didn't take long
+ 2 路 Reply 路 Translate 路 Feb 9, 2017
katielass 路 F
Nope. It was as predictable as the 9th circuit's decision. It will be over turned just as most of their decisions are overturned when challenged. But it gives the manic left a temporary reprieve from their self-imposed depression.
+ 1 路 Reply 路 Translate 路 Feb 9, 2017
GohantheThird 路 M
Very true. We are over-dramatic sometimes.
+ 0 路 Reply 路 Translate 路 Feb 9, 2017
Loretta78 路 46-50, F
No. Why should I surprised? 馃檮
+ 2 路 Reply 路 Translate 路 Feb 10, 2017
Sicarium 路 46-50, M
Good thing Obama never went to court. Oh. Wait.

Despite all the hysterical freaking out the left has been doing, we have separation of powers for a reason. System is working as intended.
+ 1 路 Reply 路 Translate 路 Feb 9, 2017
GohantheThird 路 M
Indeed it is, and I'm sure Obama went too. I am certain this ban won't hold up, but it's always good to see the justice system at work.
+ 0 路 Reply 路 Translate 路 Feb 9, 2017
Someonethatyouusedtoknow 路 26-30, M
Nope
+ 2 路 Reply 路 Translate 路 Feb 9, 2017
BemyValentine 路 F
Nope.
+ 2 路 Reply 路 Translate 路 Feb 11, 2017
BrattyBetchSona 路 F
+ 2 路 Reply 路 Translate 路 Feb 9, 2017
UserNameSW 路 46-50, M
He isn't going to court. That what trained professional lawyers are for.
+ 1 路 Reply 路 Translate 路 Feb 9, 2017
Underconstruction 路 F
Asshole can barely read.

He doesn麓t even read what he signs.

Yes, I know, pathetic.
+ 4 路 Reply 路 Translate 路 Feb 9, 2017
bijouxbroussard 路 F
Lol, no.
+ 4 路 Reply 路 Translate 路 Feb 9, 2017
MsAnnThropy
No.
+ 1 路 Reply 路 Translate 路 Feb 9, 2017
 
Post Comment