Asking
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Is being an 'honest liar' a big thing in politics.

Opponents of Boris Johnson and Donald Trump seem confused as to why people support politicians who seem like such blatant charlatans.

Perhaps though, this is the wrong way of thinking about it. When trust for politicians is low and people acceot that politics is a cynical game, maybe its an advantage to be seen as more obviously cynical.

Labour's leader Keir Starmer is now tanking in the polls in spite of making 'integrity' a big part of his pitch and people wonder way this isnt working but I think part of the answer lies in thw question. People know they are being sold a brand and find it patronising whereas Johnson is an entertaining blag artist.

People have a strange admiration for people who blag things and get away with it. If all politicians are liars, why not go with the one who tells the best lies? Do you want your bullshit bland and technocratic and sold to you via focus group or do you prefer your bullshit to have a human face?

I am not saying any of this is good but I think the centre left really suffers through following the polls and its focus group orientated politics.
Kwek00 · 41-45, M
I've said it once, and I'll say it again. Politicians are salespeople.
To catch the voters that didn't look into the issues that are on the table currently, politicians have to sell them a narrative. And quite often, the best salesperson wins the vote. It's cynical, because it's not what elections are supposed to be about. But for some salespeople the only thing that counts is getting to that 50+1 % , and if you can't do it by rational discourse, you have to do it with spectacle. Because in politics everything goes.

I think it's more destructive when the segment of the poppulation that considers politics some kind of reality show that needs to drag them out of boredome becomes to big. That also means that that segment, doesn't really care about what is actually happening, they just want to be entertained. And in that sphere, demagogues have a higher chance of swaying the masses then annyone that tries to give an inteligent lecture on the toppic that needs to be decided.

For those idealists that are saddened by this... remember what Machiavelli said.

[quote][b]How we live is so different from how we ought to live that he who studies what ought to be done rather than what is done will learn the way to his downfall rather than to his preservation.[/b]

- Niccolo Machiavelli, [i]The Prince[/i][/quote]
QuixoticSoul · 41-45, M
I'm fine with bland and technocratic. That's what it looks like when someone is taking the gig seriously.
Burnley123 · 41-45, M
@QuixoticSoul Obviously the educated professional middle class centrist is going to be all in on that. 😎
QuixoticSoul · 41-45, M
@Burnley123 shocking, I know 🤣
BlueVeins · 22-25
I kinda agree. Biased but relevant --

[youtube=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nknYtlOvaQ0]
RodionRomanovitch · 56-60, M
I was musing about Johnson's inexplicable appeal just yesterday and came to a similar conclusion. I don't think your average voter even cares that he's full of shit. What they fall for is his flowery language and the ridiculous Churchill imitation. It doesn't really matter what he's saying , it just reminds them of the greatest hero they ever had. Like you said , he's a shameless charlatan , and an unabashed copycat.
Picklebobble2 · 56-60, M
Berlusconi managed to make a great career out of it.

Macron's 'variant' of the truth seems to be doing the same in France.

I think it's become very clear that the current crop of political leaders is clueless about either economics nor virus containment nor planning for any sort of future.

In such light i suppose those 'distanced from reality' probably serve up the most 'comfortable to live with' scenarios for the public.
Frank52 · 70-79, M
The most blatant and unashamed liar (and I am not mistaken in using that word) we have ever had in No 10. Others have been mendacious in selecting which truth to tell, but this one is brazen and positively happy to be seen as a 'good sort' while shafting the country. Cronyism is rife, Northern Ireland going up in flames in places because he did what he said no Conservative Prime Minister could ever do and only COVID is preventing the full negative effects of Brexit being reported on. (I'm happy for someone to give me an actual positive, not a jingoistic 'feeling' or false attribution of a reclaimed power.) I see no Opposition with vision or the ability to appeal to the electorate that fell over themselves falling for his nonsense. And I'm afraid, Corbyn was not that person either.
Burnley123 · 41-45, M
@Frank52 I think Corbyn's flaws are well documented and I'm not gonna lie about them. His project though at least constituted an attempt to move the country in a more progressive direction. Starmer is making no attempt to do that and he has no chance of winning power either. I doubt you would disagree when I say he's practising Tony Blair's electoral strategy but executing it badly and with zero charisma.

We live in a very Conservative country: from the institutions, the press, and the people. The Tories can do so much wrong and still have a commanding poll lead because different standards apply. For Labour to win, it would need a united party, the 2017 manifesto (radical but credible) and a leader with Nicola Sturgeon's gravitas. I can't see [b]any [/b]of these three things happening anytime soon, sadly.
Frank52 · 70-79, M
@Burnley123 I share your despondency at a lack of a credible progressive alternative. I felt a bit like this in Thatcher's day, but you couldn't accuse her of mendacity: she did what she said she'd do which I thought was pretty brutal. Despite the newspapers opposition, I thought that Neil Kinnock could have been a good alternative, but time and again, the voting system returned a government that worked against the interests of the majority.
Burnley123 · 41-45, M
@Frank52 I'm still a member of the party but I have become a lot less active since the election. I don't know how I could even canvass for Starmer. What are his good points and what is he going to do differently to the Tories? How could I tell someone he is going to make their life better without lying? These a rhetorical questions. I never expected him to be radical but I expected [i]something[/i]. He has disappointed on every level, moral and strategic.

A lot of people didn't like Corbyn but you could at least point to the policies and you were fighting for something which you believed in. I am not gonna be arsed knocking on doors for Starmer and a lot of Labour members feel the same.

Sorry for the rant LOL
Northwest · M
It's not the politicians, it's the people who elect them.
JoeyFoxx · 51-55, M
To me, the ones who paint themselves as sincere tend to pander to the whiners while condescending to the masses.

I don’t think Johnson and the Orange Menace are in the same category. Orange Menace learned one thing from his father: brand development. He has zero other skills. He is quite literally dangerous. Whereas Johnson may be brutish, but he’s still a statesman.

The “honest” ones are rarely honest. They claim to believe in science, but manipulate it to support their agenda.
They point fingers at the opposition, and yet use many of the same tactics.

It’s a mirage.
Burnley123 · 41-45, M
@JoeyFoxx For one thing, Boris isnt his real mame. He 'became' Boris at Oxford and developed his clever fool act there.

He is a blag artist, just very British in style which is maybe why he seems statesmanlike to Americans. Its like how you guys have a Roman general with a British accent in movies to add 'authenticity'. Our accent gives us an old money kind of cred, whether we deserve it or not.

Trump was a very American blag artist. He literally is both a salesman and a reality tv star.
JoeyFoxx · 51-55, M
@Burnley123 fair enough

I still think Boris has more upstairs
sunrisehawk · 61-69, M
I'm amazed that the number of people and media talking heads who throw the work lie around so much. Everyone makes errors and mistakes, especially when speaking in public off the cuff, but lies are deliberate attempts to deceive.

When you hear someone say something that then see it in the news twisted and called a lie, it just destroys trust in the media. It doesn't matter if it is Trump telling the truth and being reported as a lie or Biden lying and being reported as truth. People will make up their own mind eventually and if they have lost trust in those reporting the news, they will believe what they want to.
Burnley123 · 41-45, M
@sunrisehawk I think that is a problem though. If we reach a point where evudence doesn't matter and people just believe what they want. It makes it even easier to manipulate people.
milkymum1 · 31-35, F
Its about time the speaker of the house stopped BJ for telling blatant lies and start to answer the questions that he's actually meant to

Its gone on for far too long now every PM just lying there way through PMQs and running off back to number 10 and then to send out a represtative to speak on there behalf.

Also its time MPs started acting as they sued to diplomatically, by example, represent there constituently and not tow party line , get rid of the whips and make Parliament a democracy not the joke it is at the moment
Burnley123 · 41-45, M
@milkymum1 What do you think of Starmer? Be as honest as you like.
JohnOinger · 41-45, M
The Ladies Man Has A,Profile Pic Now lol
Burnley123 · 41-45, M
@JohnOinger I noticed, you good looking chap.
@JohnOinger Oooooo!
One word: populism.
Talking on behalf of the little people.
Kwek00 · 41-45, M
@Burnley123 Really depends on the poppulist and what he's selling. It's not just a low income class that votes for poppulists. Like in the US for instance, I'm pretty sure that Donald had some really big backers. I can't imagine that Farrage his clique didn't have some big backers. I think they recruit from all layers out of society.
Burnley123 · 41-45, M
@Kwek00 I'm hardly gonna not know about that or disagree. Not my point,
Kwek00 · 41-45, M
@Burnley123 okay, then I missed it
No one seems to care about the lies until it affects them.
Burnley123 · 41-45, M
hunkalove · 61-69, M
Good decent human beings do not go into politics. If you begin with that, it's downhill from there.
Burnley123 · 41-45, M
@hunkalove I think some do. Corbyn and Sanders are examples. They get savaged though.
I gave up with politics a long time ago. No faith in any of it anymore.
Burnley123 · 41-45, M
@AFreeThinker81 Im big into it but disillusioned. Ill follow it but wont be a regular activist again until i find a reason.
jackjjackson · 61-69, M
It’s happening right now here in the US. Biden’s handlers have him doing it:

https://similarworlds.com/30-Miscellaneous/3863233-Biden-forbids-government-employees-to-use-the
jackjjackson · 61-69, M
Any charlatan category must include Mrs Clinton and Prince Charles.

 
Post Comment