Trump's defense strategy?

[i][quote]Adam Schiff now doesn’t seem to want the Whistleblower to testify. NO! Must testify to explain why he got my Ukraine conversation sooo wrong, not even close. Did Schiff tell him to do that? We must determine the Whistleblower’s identity to determine WHY this was done to the USA.

Democrat’s game was foiled when we caught Schiff fraudulently making up my Ukraine conversation, when I released the exact conversation Transcript, and when Ukrainian President and the Foreign Minister said there was NO PRESSURE, very normal talk! A total Impeachment Scam![/quote][/i]
Must testify...
Nope. In fact, pushing to uncover the whistleblower's identity may be in violation of federal law.

he got my Ukraine conversation sooo wrong...
The actual recotded phone call has been released. Does he not know that?

WHY this was done to the USA...
It was done to him, not to the country. This is a common tactic - to include everyone in possible consequences.

when I released the exact conversation Transcript...
The transcript Schiff read was written and provided by Trump's own aides. And again, we've got the phone call.

Ukrainian President...said there was NO PRESSURE...
He also said there was no wrongdoing on the part of Biden. Can't pick and choose.

Top | Newest First | Oldest First

MistyCee

How people can't see that going after the Whistleblower is not legitimate completely escapes me. There is no valid or legitimate reason for exposing this guy, plenty of good reasons not to, the most important being the ones Trump is making obvious, retaliating and calling for him to be hung.

sunsporter1649 · 70-79, M

@MistyCee LOL, of course it would not occur to you that the whistleblower is making it all up, and cross-examination under oath would bring up crap the democrats would rather hide under the rocks

MistyCee

@sunsporter1649 It has indeed occurred to me, and if Democrats intend to use this Whistleblower's testimony he needs to be cross examined, or his testimony should be excluded on that basis alone.

But, even if he did make it all up, and "lure" others to come forward, it shouldn't prohibit their testimony.

Do you really think that witness intimidation is a good thing? If it wasnt Trump being accused, but a Mexican gang, would you think it's a good idea to publish a witnesses address?

The minute Trump talked about what we used to do with spies, he made things a lot harder with convincing his non-believers that his interest in uncloaking the Whistleblower's identity had any legitimate purpose.

Trump wants to out the guy, not necessarily even to take him out, but to flex his muscle and send a message to others who might be tempted to cooperate.