Mueller report

Was mr mueller blunt or what regarding his findings n analysis of his 2 yr investigation? And should our president be relieved...or more concerned?

Top | Newest First | Oldest First

bijouxbroussard · F

It makes pretty clear that Trump tried to derail the investigation, which in itself might prompt more questions than answers. But whether it means any longterm damage is negligible. Trump’s been Teflon so far.

View 65 more replies »

Winterwine · 61-69, M

@HerKing you had to be a brit..i checked! Fckwit...i always wanted to use that word in appropriate conversation

HerKing · 61-69, M

@Winterwine 😉

Mistakesmakeus · M

@HerKing ah yes a true libtard

Mistakesmakeus · M

Trump didn't do anything wrong

View 56 more replies »

HerKing · 61-69, M

@MasterLee The one Trump invented?

But that still leaves the ongoing one sanctioned by Trump.

Winterwine · 61-69, M

@Mistakesmakeus his family...meaning his wife n inlaw n daughter using personal email for govt business...the same issues he went all out on hillary clinton.

Winterwine · 61-69, M

Our mr ttump publically owned up to the shutdown...repeatedly. @HerKing @HerKing @Mistakesmakeus

windinhishair · 61-69, M

Somewhat lost in the reporting today is the fact that an additional 14 criminal referrals were made to other jurisdictions based on evidence uncovered by Mueller. At least some of those are likely to involve Trump directly. He should be concerned, but those are way out of his control now.

View 1 more replies »

windinhishair · 61-69, M

@Human1000 Yes, but it isn't one of the main topics, and it is the one most likely to bear on Trump's future.

Human1000 · M

Oh, its been on cnn and msnbc, NY Times.@windinhishair

windinhishair · 61-69, M

@Human1000 Trump will still face justice. It just may have to wait until he loses the 2020 election and leaves office in January 2021.

Picklebobble2 · 56-60, M

I would have thought the sheer number of folk willing to go to jail for this man was implication enough.
Even a die-hard Trumpite has to question [i]that[/i] one !

Obstruction of justice on numerous levels. And if not that then certainly questions on abuse of power whilst in office.

Winterwine · 61-69, M

@Picklebobble2 one of the bullet points states that only reason mr trump is not in more trouble re obstruction is his aides refused to carry out his orders

Picklebobble2 · 56-60, M

@Winterwine So what do you do if you know your President has acted inappropriately almost to the point of breaking the law. Suspect he probably [i]has[/i] since others have seemingly willingly gone to jail [i]for[/i] him !

Wait for the first one to write a book ?

Winterwine · 61-69, M

@Picklebobble2 another woodward expose?

Chrisy1 · 18-21, F

People should perhaps go out and vote at the next elections, I believe there was a 55% turnout last time which suggests a serious apathy towards politics in the US - hopefully Trump has cured that!!

Winterwine · 61-69, M

@Chrisy1 exactly!

Picklebobble2 · 56-60, M

@Chrisy1 That only works if you can pick a candidate that the electorate doesn't rate as a WORSE option !
See last election !

curiosi · 61-69, F

It's obvious a cover up to protect the Obama administration and Hillary. They wasted a lot of our money trying to make Trump look bad. Many of us knew it all along.