Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »
Bonnin · 26-30, F
IT would make sense if there was a till short! Don't want to lose your job because you served your relative.
bhatjc · 46-50, M
@Bonnin Some companies have rules about serving relatives.

This comment is hidden. Show Comment
SteelHands · 61-69, M
To prevent any potential litigious claim, exception or biases by any litigious persons. Yes as far as I am aware this is a common policy of most retail establishments.
Not sure what kind of business that is, but it is not uncommon for employees not to serve family, perhaps even friends. It's simply meant to eliminate any suspicion of free extras or improprieties. Cashiers would certainly not check out a family member or friend if at all possible. I know of no law that would contradict. It's usually at stores discretion.
MarineBob · 56-60, M
pretty typical of all places of employment
CaptainCanadia · 41-45, M
That's an insane and stupid rule. However, it is likely within the rights of your boss to do so. Doesn't make it any less wrong though.
SW-User
65 is legal working age?
SW-User
@saintchantal: Marry me to get myself in Canada I will pay you good money to run home and I will cook indian food for you. Also you can use me.
saintsong · 41-45, F
@Crazyforbald: Sorry friend, I'm already married :)
SW-User
@saintchantal: Sorry I didn't knew that.
bhatjc · 46-50, M
catch 22 on this. Some places have rules about serving family members

 
Post Comment