Sometimes, but it really depends on how the woman looks overall. Shorter legs can look nice, too, as well as medium legs, medium short legs, medium long legs, short to medium long legs, medium to long short legs, etc.

If the rest of her doesn't take my fancy, she wouldn't be more attractive. She'd just have nice legs

Not really... I like girls with a bit of shape. Muscular fit

I do and always have. I'm not sure why. I've never been a "breast man," like so many men seem to be. I've always been attracted to long, thin, well-proportioned legs. They're so beautiful to me.

Not really. Long legs CAN be sexy, but I like shapely legs. In my experience, longer legs usually don't have the best curves/shape.

It's their shape and presentation that counts. As Lincoln said, they should be just long enough to reach the ground!

It doesn't make much of a difference, although I do have more of a dating history with short women.

Yes, but I couldn't define why - like any physical attraction.

If shapely, far to many women today equate skinny with attractive.

i find women attractive. no matter what their features are

I don't really have an opinion.

Heaven's above!

curvy > long/tall

Hmm... Not long... but I do like skinny legs.