Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »
Capo2 · 56-60, M
Whom does that sort of thing? 😁😃😄
SW-User
@Capo2 I think its those that don't know better. 😋
Capo2 · 56-60, M
@SW-User Your rite!

hunkalove · 61-69, M
That bothers me too. I was upset to see a movie titled The Killer That Stalked New York (1950), but it's right, "that" not "who".
@hunkalove That would upset me too. It's just so obvious that "who/whom" are the only grammatically correct words to refer to a person.
covfefe234 · 31-35, M
Graylight · 51-55, F
Or 'there's' instead of 'there are' when referring to a singular. 'There are a lot of countries', not 'there's a lot of countries.'

Or "less" instead of 'fewer." Less is a measurement of volume. Fewer refers to individual items. 'There are fewer people at the game', not 'there are less people at the game.'

Its - possessive. Only used in the possessive. Its own façade was cracking.
It's - a contraction of it is. 'It's a shame' for 'it is a shame.'
SW-User
It's / its is purely usage. I have a mental block when it comes to these words. I know the usage, but I type something else.
PaleandPolluted · 36-40, F
It’s is an abbreviation for it is hence the apostrophe
hunkalove · 61-69, M
@PaleandPolluted "It's" is an abbreviation of "It is". "Its" means it belongs to it.
PaleandPolluted · 36-40, F
@hunkalove 🤔 Oh yeah. I’ve only just found out a lot and as well are two words lol
SW-User
Should be whom not who! Lol
@SW-User Not for most sentences. "Whom" is only used in sentences like: "to whom are you referring to"
SW-User
@everythingisalreadytakenagain the 'Lol' at the end is a clue. *no humour here!*
@SW-User lol

*humor
https://blog.oxforddictionaries.com/2012/09/07/that-who-which/
FreeSpirit1 · 51-55, F
They like to annoy the pedantic people.
covfefe234 · 31-35, M
"That" can be used insteadd of "who".
hunkalove · 61-69, M
@covfefe234 Nope.
TeAbsolvo · F
English is a funny language.

 
Post Comment