masterofyou · 80-89, M
Daisy57 · 56-60, F
@masterofyou Yes indeed He is. He loved first so we could love others.
justanotherone · 56-60, M
View 1 more replies »
Daisy57 · 56-60, F
@justanotherone yeah I did not sleep last night, catching up.
justanotherone · 56-60, M
@Daisy57 Ok, let's answer it.
If love is a positive force and hate is a negative force, then the result probably depends on mass, distance, resistance, momentum, and whether either person has had enough coffee.
Two opposite forces don’t automatically destroy each other. If they’re equal, you might just get equilibrium, which in human relationships is probably called “an awkward family dinner.”
A strong positive force could resist the negative one, the negative force could overwhelm it, or the interaction could change both of them. And if enough positive energy is added to the system, perhaps the negative force gets converted rather than simply cancelled.
So scientifically speaking: love probably needs sufficient magnitude, persistence and good boundary conditions.
I’m fairly sure Einstein forgot to publish that paper.
If love is a positive force and hate is a negative force, then the result probably depends on mass, distance, resistance, momentum, and whether either person has had enough coffee.
Two opposite forces don’t automatically destroy each other. If they’re equal, you might just get equilibrium, which in human relationships is probably called “an awkward family dinner.”
A strong positive force could resist the negative one, the negative force could overwhelm it, or the interaction could change both of them. And if enough positive energy is added to the system, perhaps the negative force gets converted rather than simply cancelled.
So scientifically speaking: love probably needs sufficient magnitude, persistence and good boundary conditions.
I’m fairly sure Einstein forgot to publish that paper.
Freetime · 56-60, M
alongalone · M