@HikingMan
Self-talk is amusing isn’t it? 🤣

@Jackrules You would know as you sit inside your own little bubble talking to you and people who think exactly like you.

I certainly hope you're not insuating that I have any alternate accounts here ?

I certainly don't need 2 accounts to clap back against stupid shit that makes no real sense outside of the bubble of inherent biases and actual biases that represent 75% of the Republican party at this time.

I'm old enough to remember true discourse and bipartisan negotiation.

The canonical Gospels contain no recorded teaching in which Jesus explicitly mentions same-sex sexual acts or the modern category of being transgender; that absence is the starting point for scholarship and pastoral debate.
Because Jesus’ recorded teachings focus on themes such as covenant, love, purity, and marriage in general, later Christian interpretation turns to Pauline letters and Hebrew Bible texts to address sexual ethics.
The lack of explicit Gospel statements means communities must decide whether to read later texts as universally prescriptive or historically situated

None of what's stated inside of biblical text about sexuality comes from Jesus or GOD but is later interpretations and assumptions

Mostly inserted into it by the King James connotations and the Catholics of the time that were trying to exert control over the current populace of the times.
Which they managed to so in a convincing manner that permeates through today's times.