View 3 more replies »
peterlee · M
@iamthe99 It is uncertain whether Trump would come to aid the European countries of NATO if one of them was invaded.
Strategists, such as Michael Clarke. suggest Putin wants a land corridor from Kalinsburg to the rest of Russia. If he were to gain a large Swedish Island the Baltic Sea he could cut of Latvia, Estonia and Lithuania. and Finland.
Strategists, such as Michael Clarke. suggest Putin wants a land corridor from Kalinsburg to the rest of Russia. If he were to gain a large Swedish Island the Baltic Sea he could cut of Latvia, Estonia and Lithuania. and Finland.
iamthe99 · M
@peterlee Trump, at this moment, is obliged by the NATO treaty to come to the aid of any NATO nation if one is invaded. And Sweden is now part of NATO, so by taking "a large, Swedish island", Putin risks World War 3.
Plus Michael Clarke has recently said he can't see the Russian army lasting beyond 2026.
Plus Michael Clarke has recently said he can't see the Russian army lasting beyond 2026.
PicturesOfABetterTomorrow · 41-45, M
Most of this is just nonsense repeated by western propagandists for years at this point. The title is right though.
Russia has been very clear about their intentions and even set a time and place many months ago for talks.
It is exclusively the west that are making demands of ceasefires as conditions. But to be blunt the losing side doesn't dictate terms and why would Russia agree to this when Starmer and other Euopean leaders are talking about sneaking in a European "army" the minute shooting stops.
Then you have Zelensky who seems like he is in Turkey for what he expected to be a photo op in a separate city and not in any way addressing the decree that he made himself making it illegal to negotiate with Russia so this was always a waste of time.
And then you have the NATO contingent pretending they are not belligerents in the conflict.
It really is a clown show.
Russia has been very clear about their intentions and even set a time and place many months ago for talks.
It is exclusively the west that are making demands of ceasefires as conditions. But to be blunt the losing side doesn't dictate terms and why would Russia agree to this when Starmer and other Euopean leaders are talking about sneaking in a European "army" the minute shooting stops.
Then you have Zelensky who seems like he is in Turkey for what he expected to be a photo op in a separate city and not in any way addressing the decree that he made himself making it illegal to negotiate with Russia so this was always a waste of time.
And then you have the NATO contingent pretending they are not belligerents in the conflict.
It really is a clown show.
JSul3 · 70-79
@PicturesOfABetterTomorrow
Please answer the question.
Who invaded who?
Putin invaded Ukraine. Ukraine had no plan to invade Russia.
Please answer the question.
Who invaded who?
Putin invaded Ukraine. Ukraine had no plan to invade Russia.
PicturesOfABetterTomorrow · 41-45, M
@JSul3 Not playing games.
But we get it. You work for the Ukrainian propaganda ministry.
Context and relevant topics don't matter to you.
Facts on the ground don't matter when your entire position is based on propaganda.
But we get it. You work for the Ukrainian propaganda ministry.
Context and relevant topics don't matter to you.
Facts on the ground don't matter when your entire position is based on propaganda.
PicturesOfABetterTomorrow · 41-45, M
@JSul3 Even if we accept your position. "He hit me first" stops being a relevant argument at about the age of 5.
iamthe99 · M
Only one person decides whether or not the war will continue. And that's Putin. He started this war, only he can end it.
But, just like the unhinged dictator in the Middle East, Benjamin Netanyahu, it is in Putin's interests to continue the war indefinitely.
So there will be no peace.
But, just like the unhinged dictator in the Middle East, Benjamin Netanyahu, it is in Putin's interests to continue the war indefinitely.
So there will be no peace.