Exciting
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »
Top | New | Old
7B is very little and nothing these useless failed states can do would damage NATO. Russia is poorer than Texas and their military is a joke. They’re going to get destroyed whenever we want and they’re already crippled by sanctions. That’s what they get for not knowing their place, challenging NATO is not what you do when you have 10k GDP per capita
@Cierzo They have been interfering with US and Europe for years, nobody attacked them. NATO didn’t even get involved properly. We can ourselves destroy Russia if we want, by the state of their military we would need a week at most to make sure the entire country is a ruin. And without Europe helping out. You can observe that we are just arming our allies so far
Cierzo · M
@MarkStrong11 If interfering with other countries is a reason to attack a country, the US should have been attacked decades ago.
@Cierzo But this time Russia invaded Ukraine and not vice versa. And it’s just a reason, it also requires being able to actually carry it out. But Russia has neither, they’re both weak and aggressive. Ukraine just wanted out of their sphere of influence, can’t blame them for wanting to get rid of a failed state. Russia has a lower GDP than your country, which is also not the most economically viable to put it mildly

AuRevoir · 36-40, M
Logically it makes sense..

But rumors can also be just rumors.. and if the taliban would be selling anything it would likely just be what’s extra and left to sell..

Which means an enormous surplus must have been left over..

As the taliban themselves will want to use it for their own devices..
scrood · 31-35
Maybe they can get Viktor Bout to fly the cargo planes there?

I always thought most of that stuff was shipped straight to China for reverse engineering
Notanymore · 41-45, M
Seems like good laundry practice to me.
HollyW · 18-21, F
Why would you hope for something that damages Ukraine, USA and NATO? Are you an anarchist?
cherokeepatti · 61-69, F
@Cierzo I believe NATO is being weakened. Energy prices right now making it harder to fund fuel for all their vehicles. That’s just one thing.
HollyW · 18-21, F
@Cierzo Russia is the aggressor. This obvious point was lost on you.
Cierzo · M
@HollyW NATO has been the aggressor in Serbia, Iraq, Syria. It should have stopped existing three decades ago once Warsaw Pact was defunct.
At best, deeply exaggerated

 
Post Comment