MrBrownstone · 46-50, M
View 1 more replies »
SociallyAwkwardGirl · 26-30, F
@MrBrownstone he also owned slaves
MrBrownstone · 46-50, M
@SW-User Already did.
SW-User
@MrBrownstone Oh. I see. Alternative facts. Debunked quotes can be real if you want them to be.
Quizzical · 46-50, M
The main problem is that technology advanced far faster than the ability of either law or society to deal with it...
When the second amendment was drafted the fastest reload speed for a firearm was one round every 15-20 seconds.
We now have weapons like the AK-47 which can fire approximately 200 rounds in that same amount of time.
The amendment HAS to be looked at to take those technological advancements into account. You cannot operate a law that is 227 years old that deals with technology and still expect it to be relevant today...
When the second amendment was drafted the fastest reload speed for a firearm was one round every 15-20 seconds.
We now have weapons like the AK-47 which can fire approximately 200 rounds in that same amount of time.
The amendment HAS to be looked at to take those technological advancements into account. You cannot operate a law that is 227 years old that deals with technology and still expect it to be relevant today...
AnnieMal · F
He could've jumped out with a tire iron too, but without debating the tool he used, here's a big problem here... He definitely broke the law! In fact quite a few laws in his actions. Did he have or need a license. Did he get arrested for attempted assault, or for brandishing (unlawful display/use)of a firearm? Did they prosecute him? Did he get sent to prison where he belongs? Did he lose his gun rights/license? Wanna bet no? I bet he wasn't a licensed gun owner too. Yep, big problem.
There are places in this big country that I wouldn't venture into unless I was legally armed. It's pretty lawless in some cities, and to deny the opportunity to defend yourself is just wrong.
There are places in this big country that I wouldn't venture into unless I was legally armed. It's pretty lawless in some cities, and to deny the opportunity to defend yourself is just wrong.
AnnieMal · F
What was to stop him from coming to the car?... A gun if your girlfriend was carrying, or if I would have been there. I'll not go defenseless here.
The criminals don't care one bit about the laws. None of the laws mean anything to them and gun laws mean even less. They really need to fix the court system. That's why I said the crime rate would rise if guns were banned. The criminals would keep their guns, the courts would continue doing nothing, and considering the plethora of firearms here the supply is almost unlimited on the black market, and if the supply did dry up, they would smuggle them in across the porous borders. Lots of things that could be fixed here go unchanged all because of the time wasted on the gun grab approach to solving the illegal use and crime issue.
The criminals don't care one bit about the laws. None of the laws mean anything to them and gun laws mean even less. They really need to fix the court system. That's why I said the crime rate would rise if guns were banned. The criminals would keep their guns, the courts would continue doing nothing, and considering the plethora of firearms here the supply is almost unlimited on the black market, and if the supply did dry up, they would smuggle them in across the porous borders. Lots of things that could be fixed here go unchanged all because of the time wasted on the gun grab approach to solving the illegal use and crime issue.
UserNameSW · 46-50, M
No one likes regulation.
@UserNameSW It´s in the Constitution that they have claimed to protect with their effing guns.
UserNameSW · 46-50, M
@Underconstruction an amendment by definition can be changed.
AnnieMal · F
You lost the debate again with
2nd Amendment crazies
.
hertoy · 70-79, M
Out of context, it's meaningless
SW-User
@Underconstruction Rude, but okay...
@SW-User 😉
SW-User
@Underconstruction I really want to know are you able to explain it?