beckychandler · F
CharlieZ · 70-79, M
@beckychandler I´m not a nominalist, but...
A material "thing"?
A material "thing"?
CharlieZ · 70-79, M
@beckychandler Sorry, Becky if I´m wrong.
But seems, only seems, that your assertion comes from some kind of armchair philosophy and not from Math.
Nor from Science.
Scholastics anyone?
But seems, only seems, that your assertion comes from some kind of armchair philosophy and not from Math.
Nor from Science.
Scholastics anyone?
beckychandler · F
@CharlieZ William of Occam's idea plagues us today. Everything is just a name. If the government chooses to print paper (or digits) and call it money --well, it is money. If Sally decides to called herself a man, well by God she is a man. Nothing is real.
I am the realist.
I am the realist.
SatyrService · M
View 11 more replies »
CharlieZ · 70-79, M
@SatyrService Thank you for sharing!
I promisse to watch it tomorrow.
I promisse to watch it tomorrow.
SatyrService · M
@CharlieZ 3 parts,, all very good!
tallpowerhouseblonde · 36-40, F
midnightsun · 26-30, M
@tallpowerhouseblonde lol
Keepitdown · F
Concept of course, can’t be assigned a definitive single value
BigbangFACTS · M
More like overbearing
Echambers101 · 26-30, M
a number
Axeroberts · 56-60, M
not a number
midnightsun · 26-30, M
both.