@AverageMuslim the card game? a very long time ago i have ☺

@VladG94 very strong take tbh

Plus, AI's greatest limitation which the field does a poor job expressing is that's it's literally the most advanced form of copy and paste ever 😂

People LEGIT think it's sentient or cognitive but it's a cascading series of probabilistic next guesses TRAINED ON HUMAN SENTENCE STRUCTURES

It's literally capped by human capacity and it's greatest user is to fetch data rather than be used to DO something in an orderly fashion. It's insane how much human scaffolding holds it up that's obscured from the public

@AverageMuslim Well, the core reason is because human fear seems to override people's understanding of reasons as the core factor of things as to why AI skepticism is flawed on their own, and so they rely on identity-based politics forms of dialectics where they enforce an extreme high-level of moral paternalisms and safety paternalisms that involves rejections of usages of both personal freedoms and economic freedoms when with AI to be honest, as the AI skeptics are the ones that have an unreasonable fears of something that is actually controlled by people themselves to begin with and the AI aren't what's acting on their own types of actions of things since they can't have their own acts on their own themselves but it's the people controlling it with their own constraints vs. freedoms within the AI areas which is essentially mapped in the ontology aspects of things to be honest, I can DM you what I've mapped out here if you're interested to be honest!!!!

@Rudboy41 I'd really have to think about that. That's very thought provoking because history itself already is fluid and inaccurate for many of the recent hundreds of years. Past history tended to be more honor based and maintained more integrity. But losing new history might not be as bad. I'm thinking if people had knowledge like how to rebuild a society from scratch withheld, that could be catastrophic. Or how to live independently without "subcribing to life" with your whole life being bills and stuff to the puppet masters, then we're in big trouble 😅

@Rudboy41 AI is not going to replace humans at all, just because people are reacting with fear-induced prophecies that results in them feeling fear that they need the Hobbesian arguments of all rights being defined and controlled by the state doesn't mean the prophecies that they believe in it's really 100% absolute nor certainty that it's going to happen since it's people obedience in prophetic rules that results in this pattern of cosmic universalism for authority to be honest!!!!

@VladG94 I am not offended at all.. But I would like to point out that I made quite a decent living doing stuff not to far from what I just threw together there. Though of course more detailed and better researched. And regarding yout reply, I would offer this:😷
[media=https://youtu.be/hIdsjNGCGz4]

@whowasthatmaskedman Well I've actually researched this much more than the AI skeptics and their own fears of things actually have since they're the ones that's going by fear and logic doesn't work well with fear and I'm actually going by logic approaches of things that have no basis in fears of anything regarding AI to be honest, as I'm personally taking the liberty approach to things and offered the third option and it's that why even have any rules at all? Since I already explained why we don't need the state-approved legislations onto AI in limiting and restricting what AI can do since this is essentially based on fears of freedoms that they have the need to advocate for compulsive governance to restrict freedoms in general and the real problem is their own fears of things rather than anything since they have no basis in empirical evidences to anything because they're placing their own moral paternalistic fears above the freedoms and rights of other people too to be honest, because coercion and the use of force would need to be applied to prevent anyone that has dissent in having positive views and opinions in regards to AI including AI for economic productivity benefits or AI relationships in a general manner, and if you have the urge to want to argue that it's "unhealthy" then you're going by that same moral paternalism with the pretense of "safety" paternalisms since no one in the authority manners would personally argue things out of "safety" or "healthy" rather than going by their own true motives of censoring and silencing everything to suit their own morals and interests and they're never going to tell you this because people would be outraged if people discover that arguing anything that isn't out of "safety" or "healthy" would otherwise be deemed as outrageous and looked down on in a reputational level if they openly say that they are doing this to restrict personal freedoms and economic freedoms in general to be honest!!!! And I am actually talking about the prophetic fears that AI skeptics maintain of treating the fear-induced prophecies that "AI will take over humanity in a dystopian manner" as infallible is the very core prophetic fears based on treating prophetic rule as infallible which leads to further risks of cosmic universalism to be honest!!!!

@VladG94 I am far from an AI sceptic. Its here and it will be developed. And probably more by a country like China, where the ethics brakes are off. I dont, however, believe that these commercial Data centres are where AI will find its niche. I posit that thins will be taking intelligence to where the human body cant go, for whatever reason. And thats where the future of AI will be found.. However, if you do create a true intelligence, it will include the ability to exceed its programming. And by definition that means the ability to lie and deceive. I dont have a problem with that. People do it all the time and we havent blown the planet up yet..To serve humans, AI will be great. I just dont believe we have discovered the best use of it yet..😷

@Teirdalin okay, that's actually really cool tbh

I haven't ever made local AI models yet 👀
Does it take long?

@Crys76 how deep does that cognitive pyramid really go? 👀

@AverageMuslim I don’t know how deep this pyramid goes. But humans are the most intelligent species—though I suspect that won’t be the case for much longer.

@Crys76 No, you're just only acting in fear and logic doesn't seem to work well with fear to be honest!!!!

@newjaninev2 Bullshit, because it's your own human fears towards AI as to why you "feel threatened" when actually that you yourself is acting on your own irrational fears themselves as logic doesn't seem to work well when it comes to fear in general to be honest!!!!

@VladG94 whatever you're trying to say, it didn't make it.

Try again.

Shorter sentences.

Work out what you want to say.

One thought per sentence.

OK?

@newjaninev2 Not interested, sorry but I'm not sorry!!!!