Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »
OwnerOfMany · 90-99, M
The problem with all you have written here is that it is your interpretation of your perception of writings of the perceptions of other people. This is not philosophy, it is an opinion.
No offense intended but you need to read less and live more. At this point in your life you are too blinded by arrogance and clinging to the opinions you have formed to actually experience "life".
FlowerAlchemist · 22-25, T
@OwnerOfMany Actually, they are my original thoughts. I am sure other people arrived to these conclusions before, but I got to them by philosophizing, not by reading.
I know I am young, but I am also mature enough not to be arrogant. I consider it fair to judge a thought by its nature and arguments, not by the age of the writer. That is not philosophy.
@OwnerOfMany This lady is a philosopher- in- the- works.

She is not exhibiting any arrogance.

People who don't understand others always seem to love to try to drag them down to their own level.

PhilDeep · 51-55, M
I found philosophical readings interesting but often they seemed to reduce to definitions, what follows from them and disagreements stemming from different definitions. While the logic and conclusions can be interesting, I find literature more fascinating partly due to its being less abstract.
There is no future and there never will be.

This fallacy of thinking is a mind bender, but just think about it.

The future is a hope and a fantasy and nothing more. When and IF it materializes it is the present.

 
Post Comment