I Have A Foreskin

@consa01

[c=#008099]Just watched both videos. Great find, Consa! The first video was extremely informative for those who are uncertain about foreskin but quite frankly, everything she said I have always been a strong proponent of myself. And she is quite right when she states that some fully intact guys have less foreskin than others, while other guys have significantly more foreskin than what one might have anticipated on a guy. And just as she made note of her own experiences with foreskin, I too have experienced both ends of the spectrum when it comes to variable length foreskin on guys, including no foreskin at all. They're all good, no matter what status a guy has found himself in life. But specific foreskin types (or no types) comes down to a matter of personal preference for a woman/man.

And that personal preferences comes only with personal experience, not necessarily what mom told us what was best for us! lol!

Thanks for submitting these videos which I believe every new parent should watch before embarking on parenthood. I also believe anyone who has never experienced intimate relations with a fully intact penis should watch these videos, to dispel any uncertainties they may have picked up along the way throughout their journey of life. Cheers![/c]

@swirlie The best foreskin friendly videos in YouTube were all created by women. I surmise that women have evolved to be turned on by the loose moving skin on the penis. This skin can be looked at, moved by hands/feet/mouth, and experienced vaginally. I also believe that the foreskin is a feminine detail in the most masculine place, just as the clitoris is a masculine detail in the most feminine place. Hence sexuality is a yin and yang affair. The best evidence we have that the male foreskin can enhance sexual pleasure, is testimonials by American and Canadian women who've been intimate with both kinds of men.

@consa01
"The best foreskin friendly videos in YouTube were all created by women...".
[c=#008099]
I never knew that foreskin-friendly videos were made by women, but when I stop and think about it I have to ask myself, how could a man have made any of those videos when a man in fact has no inherent understanding of his foreskin's relationship to any female out there? Only she is aware of her intimate knowledge for sure and only she can convey with authenticity, what his foreskin's relationship could possibly mean to her. This fact is captured exceedingly well in videos which involve women interacting with intimate intent toward the male foreskin.
[/c]
"I surmise that women have evolved to be turned on by the loose moving skin on the penis.."
[c=#008099]
I think what you are witnessing in those foreskin-friendly videos, is a more abstract fact of otherwise hidden feminine desire, than of an evolution of female awareness toward the loose moving skin on a penis.

I was born into a Scandinavian-cultured household, but my country of birth was Canada. My sisters and I were home-schooled insofar as our sex education was concerned due to a distinct lack of meaningful content in the Canadian high school sex-ed curriculum. By contrast, my Canadian-born, Canadian-cultured girlfriends knew only about sex what the school system and their Canadian-born mothers could impart to them, which was essentially a distinct illiteracy toward their own sexuality, let alone their complete lack of awareness toward the male foreskin.

In that Canadian-cultured sex-ed curriculum, lies an inherently deficient acknowledgement of the male foreskin. In other words, the Canadian school system makes the assumption that all males will be circumcised at birth and therefore, knowledge of their foreskin is left behind at the hospital shortly after almost all Canadian males are born. Fortunately, that 19th Century medical mentality is changing in Canada.

In contrast to Canada, the high school sex-education curriculum in all high schools in any Scandinavian country make the opposite presumption about the male foreskin, thereby teaching males and females alike that all males will go into adolescence and then adulthood, fully intact from birth.

Speaking to my Canadian-cultured girlfriends back in the day about performing oral sex on a boyfriend who happens to be fully intact, was initially met with shock and non-comprehension from them, at which point my own sanity came into question by them, more so than the prospect of a lone male actually looming somewhere 'out there' in the shadows of the student parking lot whom had not actually been circumcised.

Imparting to them what my sisters and I were taught at home, soon made my girlfriends realize that I was regularly experiencing something in my social life that almost all adolescent Canadian girls and adult women alike could not even speak about publicly, let alone experience first-hand from a fully intact male. Un-circumcised males therefore, have never been on the social radar of the vast majority of Canadian women, because those same women will naturally default to the presumption that an un-circumcised condition will rarely exist anywhere in their social circles.

When you then "surmise that women have evolved to be "turned-on" by the loose moving skin on the penis", it is not actually a question of women's awareness thus evolution toward the moving parts inherent of a foreskin. It is more of an understanding that should be shared among men more so than women, that all women from a global perspective, intuitively possess full knowledge and inherent appreciation for a guy's foreskin, but through cultural default, many women particularly North American women, have never been permitted by their own cultural misgivings to experience those inherent, intuitive 'desires', due in part by the fact that any potential male-mate in her immediate world was circumcised at birth.

The vast majority of North American males therefore, have never experienced life with their OWN foreskin, let alone had the opportunity of being the provider of a foreskin to a woman who might actually be interested in experiencing all the moving skin a fully intact penis offers.

So, it's not actually about women evolving as suggested, because most North American women have no male foreskin to evolve WITH. Add what adolescent girls have been taught from the foreskin-absent sex-ed high school system, plus further exacerbate that excruciating lack of knowledge with a litany of old wives tales that were passed onto them from their mothers and grandmothers about fully intact males, you then end up with what appears to be an overall 'stalling' of sex evolution within North America in terms of a woman's relationship with a male foreskin, in addition to a male's absent relationship with his own surgically absent foreskin, which for the most part was decided FOR him by his mother!

Truth is, sex evolution has not yet evolved to modern global standards anywhere within North America, leaving mothers to essentially follow in lockstep with a mindset born of the mid-1800's in Canada and the USA. Knowing this, it makes absolute sense why so many American women voted for Donald J. Trump in 2016. Intact foreskins or Trump as President, it all comes down to not knowing any better when left with the decision. [/c]

@swirlie It is my understanding that routine circumcision is nonexistent in the Maritimes, and among First Nations / Inuit and nonMuslim immigrants, uncommon among francophones, down to 40% in Alberta and Ontario, and a minority choice in the rest of Canada. Nowhere is Canada like the American midwest, where the Hooded Warrior = Weird Dick.