Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Abortion..

This one is for the Americans on here. How many of you support the new abortion law that allows women to abort a baby up until conception (9th month)
SW-User
No. It's horrible. I cried when I found out it's an option.
SW-User
@SW-User I'm sorry for your loss dear..
And yes, it's very sad..
SW-User
@SW-User thank you sweetheart. 🤗
SW-User
@SW-User 🤗🤗
SW-User
I don't support it. I think it's horrible.
HoraceGreenley · 56-60, M
No. That's an abomination.
Graylight · 51-55, F
First, it needs to be understood. The RHA permits abortions when a medical professional's “reasonable and good faith professional judgment is based on the facts of the patient’s case” — “the patient is within twenty-four weeks from the commencement of pregnancy, or there is an absence of fetal viability, or the abortion is necessary to protect the patient’s life or health.”

In other words, women may choose to have an abortion prior to 24 weeks; pregnancies typically range from 38 to 42 weeks. After 24 weeks, such decisions must be made with a determination that there is an “absence of fetal viability” or that the procedure is “necessary to protect the patient’s life or health.” That determination must be made by a “health care practitioner licensed, certified, or authorized” under state law, “acting within his or her lawful scope of practice.”

So an abortion at an advanced stage of pregnancy isn't "ripping a baby who can feel pain from his mother's womb." The fetus will die anyway or the mother will likely die giving birth.

Now imagine your a spouse or child of the pregnant mother. Without this protection you may leave the hospital with a new child but without your wife. Or you may have a sibling but no mother to raise you. Or you may all have to grieve the stillbirth of a family member who was never going to survive in the first place. This law aims to protect against physical harm and emotional devastation. This is not a cruel, immoral law. It's a measure designed to help women.

[i]Resource used: https://www.factcheck.org/2019/02/addressing-new-yorks-new-abortion-law/[/i]
hertoy · 70-79, M
I don't like abortion regardless of term. It's murder.
Graylight · 51-55, F
@hertoy It's not considered murder to terminate that which isn't legally recognized as a viable human being.
hertoy · 70-79, M
@Graylight The legal definition needs to be changed
Graylight · 51-55, F
@hertoy Says you. The majority of the country seems fine with it.
Billybob2 · 26-30, M
If you can't take care of it, put it up for adoption I say.
SW-User
@Billybob2 yes! There are so many couples who can't have children who would give the baby a good life.
SW-User
What the law says
The RHA permits abortions when — according to a medical professional’s “reasonable and good faith professional judgment based on the facts of the patient’s case” — “the patient is within twenty-four weeks from the commencement of pregnancy, or there is an absence of fetal viability, or the abortion is necessary to protect the patient’s life or health.”

In other words, women may choose to have an abortion prior to 24 weeks; pregnancies typically range from 38 to 42 weeks. After 24 weeks, such decisions must be made with a determination that there is an “absence of fetal viability” or that the procedure is “necessary to protect the patient’s life or health.” That determination must be made by a “health care practitioner licensed, certified, or authorized” under state law, “acting within his or her lawful scope of practice.”
SweetMae · 70-79, F
I could never support that.
SW-User
@SweetMae nor could I but fortunately thats not what the law says..
TheProphet · M
Abortion is murder no matter what month.
robb65 · 56-60, M
This is the kind of thing that makes me sick about politics. No one is wanting to abort babies in the ninth month. There are very few places that will even perform an abortion that late and it is extremely expensive when you can find one. The only reason anyone would have an abortion that late is if the mother's life is at risk or there is something terribly wrong with the fetus,as in it doesn't even have a brain, or it will spend its short life in constant pain, yet there are people that knowingly misrepresent the facts. Probably the same people who would prefer the mother to die along with her fetus and yet they dare to call themselves "pro life".
SW-User
If there is no risk to the mother and the child is viable, it's morally reprehensible.
maturedragon · 26-30, M
a lot of people will say it's sick....... yet how did it pass?
DonaldTrumpet · 70-79, M
OnLYz IFz they DemocRANTZ
HoraceGreenley · 56-60, M
@DonaldTrumpet For them I support Retroactive Abortion. Just because your were born, doesn't mean you are out of the woods. May I suggest we start with
DonaldTrumpet · 70-79, M
@HoraceGreenley
DonTZ aborTz The ReDNEx I neeDZ the ReDNEx VoTeZ
Joker · 36-40, M
No, its terrible and evil.
Aside from the fact that that's not what the New York law does, I don't live in New York, and am much more interested in what the Supreme Court will do with the McGee case out of Louisiana.

It's not as gory or revolting, but I think it's going to be more significant than the New York law Nationwide.
Reject · 26-30, M
I'm curious to know the circumstances which make someone wait that long to abort.
robb65 · 56-60, M
@Reject No one carries a healthy fetus nine months and then decides "hey, I changed my mind and think I'll have an abortion today".
Reject · 26-30, M
@robb65 Those were my thoughts too. I think there's more to this law that is very reasonable, otherwise it wouldn't have been passed.
robb65 · 56-60, M
The other side of he coin is that women are allowed to die due to complications in pregnancy either because abortions are illegal, or because they are so severely restricted that Drs would rather risk the life of the patient than risk losing their license.
Think it can't happen in civilized countries? This happened in Ireland in 2012: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Death_of_Savita_Halappanavar
Steve42 · 56-60, M
I think a woman and her doctor are better to decide than the federal Government.
DonaldTrumpet · 70-79, M
KeepZ the babYz anDZ MakeZ the momma PaYZ. No menZ shoUlDz pay for FruiTz Of wimens WomBz
SW-User
That's not what the law says..
But i would be against it if it did.

 
Post Comment