Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

I Am Concerned About Climate Change

What changes will be needed to deal with climate change in the 21st century ?

I believe there are four main areas of change: End of the fossil fuel era; Expand use of public transit; Conserve energy; Plant trees.

1. [b]End of the fossil fuel era[/b]. Over a century ago began the era of oil (petroleum) and the internal combustion engine. Fossil fuels powered cars and trucks, but at too high a cost. We have pumped millions of tons of carbons into our atmosphere, warming the earth's climate. We are now in the era of transition to clean energy sources. The fossil fuel industry will fight this tooth and nail, but eventually, they won't be able to stop the change. Oil and coal for power will become a thing of the past.

2. [b]Transportation Sector[/b] - In the U.S. we will have to make much greater use of public transit and less use of cars and trucks. Congress will have to change spending priorities away from highways and toward modern high-speed passenger rail, urban light rail and low/zero emission buses. Other countries are much further along in use of public transit than the U.S. We have a lot of catching up to do. The car and highway lobby will fight this, but the change is inevitable.

3. [b]Conserving energy[/b], no more waste. In the 20th century we squandered energy resources like a drunken sailor. No more. We will have to see energy as a valuable resource that has to used judicially. Much of our energy use is wasteful and unnecessary. No able-bodied person needs a car to travel half a mile. In the U.S. our life style will have to change. But it will be a good change, we will conserve our environment and we will be healthier.

4. [b]Plant trees[/b]. Expanding forests, which sequester carbon dioxide from the atmosphere, could seriously make up for humans’ toxic carbon emissions. In 2018, the United Nations’ Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, the world’s foremost authority on climate, estimated that we’d need to plant 1 billion hectares of forest by 2050 to keep the globe from warming a full 1.5 degrees Celsius over pre-industrial levels. (One hectare is about twice the size of a football field.)

These changes and transitions will have challenges, but also great opportunities. Millions of jobs will be created here in the U.S.
TexChik · F
Nonsense ... climate change is not caused by man made issues ... other than the hoax the libs continue to carry out . No fossil fuels for a world that is completely dependent on them ? Great recipe for disaster
badminton · 61-69, MVIP
@TexChik Humanity lived for thousands of years without fossil fuels, then came oil and a new era started. Now it's time for new era. Every so often in human history there comes a time of transition. Now is time for another transition.

The evidence for human-caused climate change caused by pumping millions and millions of tons of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere is overwhelming.

https://climate.nasa.gov/scientific-consensus/ "Multiple studies published in peer-reviewed scientific journals show that 97 percent or more of actively publishing climate scientists agree: Climate-warming trends over the past century are extremely likely due to human activities. In addition, most of the leading scientific organizations worldwide have issued public statements endorsing this position." NASA.
ArtieKat · M
@badminton

[quote]"Multiple studies published in peer-reviewed scientific journals show that 97 percent or more of actively publishing climate scientists agree*: Climate-warming trends over the past century are extremely likely due to human activities.[/quote]

Of course they agree with one another! There are huge amounts of funding, worldwide, associated with climate change research - remember when it used to be called "Global Warming" but those predictions turned out to be wrong. The planet will look after itself - without the arrogance of humankind thinking their intervention is somehow significant.
Ynotisay · M
All good points. But there's a 1A that might make sense.
Maybe if those in government didn't continue to play the "hoax" game to defend the biggest polluters, and we could ALL agree that science beats belief, some of those things could actually come to fruition.
sunrisehawk · 61-69, M
The question is how and is it even possible whether you believe in man-caused climate change or not.

1. What is going to replace fossil fuels? The world is based on energy, the storage of energy is still a choice of inefficient batteries that cost a great deal and only dispense a portion of the power that is stored or coal/oil/gas that is cheap and convenient to store and use.

2. Public transit only works in high population density areas and for personal transport. Much of the USA is still low population density.

3. Conserving energy is good. Rationing it is bad, so the question becomes how to get people to conserve it.

4. The USA is really pretty good at this, the rest of the world could take lessons, though at some point will we be foresting prime productive farmland?
Quimliqer · 70-79, M
Thoughts of the misinformed...
badminton · 61-69, MVIP
@Quimliqer No, actually based on measurement and tests. Earth-orbiting satellites observing changes in the atmosphere, detecting levels of Carbon dioxide, measurements of heat on land, in the oceans, melting glaciers. All physical facts.
Quimliqer · 70-79, M
@badminton If this is a fact, then start in China, India and Saudi Arabia and tackle their pollution problem.
badminton · 61-69, MVIP
@Quimliqer We are all in the same boat.
MasterLee · 56-60, M
Lets plant trees. The rest has very little effect on climate.
firefall · 61-69, M
You missed one ... switching to a mostly vegetarian diet, massively cutting down the herds of animals that generate so much methane.

Unfortunately, as a devout meat-lover, but I dont see a way around it
Ynotisay · M
@firefall You're right about that and most don't consider the impact of cow-produced methane. It's a real issue.
badminton · 61-69, MVIP
@firefall Good point. Maybe if 30% of the population cut their meat consumption by 30% that could make a major difference.

 
Post Comment