Anyone else continually find it hard to believe that flat earthers aren't just fucking with us?

Home | Archives | Random | Latest Comments | Top 250 | Submit Quote | Search | Log In
Forums | IRC Chat | Site/Off-Topic Discussion Thread 6

skip to: post comment | read comments
Quote# 111395

The Heliocentric Hoax

About four hundred years ago a great debate challenged the Catholic world and it has still not recovered from the crushing blow of heliocentrism. Aside from the intrigues of the Judeo-Masonic Conspiracy, Nicholaus Copernicus (1473-1543), Galileo Galilei (1564-1642), and Albert Einstein (1879-1955) are three of the most prominent architects of this New Age hoax.

Copernicus, who taught the theory that the earth both rotates on its axis once a day and revolves around the sun once a year, rejuvenated this ancient Babylonian myth call heliocentrism. This re-hashing of the error of Aristarchus(1) was actually nurtured by astrology for generations, and most scholars acknowledge that those who embraced this deception after the death of Christ were Bible-hating pagans. During the Life of Copernicus this novelty was sustained via the network of Freemasonry. This satanic craft, shrouded in symbolic sophistry, has as its main objective the destruction of Christ’s Church (Truth).

The renowned Catholic historian, William Thomas Walsh, in his bibliography, Philip II, examines an unfinished article from that period entitled The New Atlantis. This work, by the revolutionist Francis Bacon, was a veiled description of the Freemason machinery as it operated in Europe around the 1500’s and is claimed by modern Masons to be their own. Bacon’s piece acknowledges that subversive "members of the order control medicine, science, astrology . . ."(2) Even today, according to the revisionist historian Ralph Epperson, Masonry claims the sun as their symbol!

It was not, however, until Galileo that heliocentrism was used to subvert the Roman Catholic world view (geocentrism). Solange Hertz, a contemporary Catholic historian, reveals that Galileo, usually in need of money, "was easily inspired and financed by the group of revolutionary spirits who clustered about Cosimo de Medici II in Florence."(3) Perhaps because of their influence, Galileo lied to the Church and College of Cardinals and resumed teaching the theory as a fact. He, "the wrangler", had a tendency to mock his opponents and to overstate his case.(4) God’s Providence, it seems, arranged a Saint and Doctor of the Church, Cardinal Robert Bellarmine, S.J., the Master of Controversial Questions, to refute the Galileo heresy. Despite Bellarmine’s impeccable refutation, the lack of viable proofs submitted by Galileo, and the failure of modern science to verify heliocentrism, Galileo has become the "light" and "Father of Modern Science", while the Church, our Mother, appears "dark" and defunct.

Modern science texts to this day, dominated by secular humanists, state that Galileo proved the Copernican sun-centered theory. The fact is, he proved nothing. Alexander von Humboldt (1769-1859), who sought to formulate the known facts about the universe into a uniform conception of nature in his Cosmos (5 Vols, 1845-1862), said quite candidly: "I have already known for a long time that we have no proof for the system of Copernicus . . .but I do not dare to be the first one to attack it."

Bernard Cohen in Birth of a New Physics, 1960, concurs: "There is no planetary observation by which we on earth can prove the earth is moving in an orbit around the sun."...

Continued:

[link to lapidesclamabunt.angelfire.com]


Nicolaus Copernicus was a Freemason who is held in high regard for creating the the Heliocentric Hoax which was further perpetrated by another freemason Icon, Galileo Galilei.

Lodge Copernicus - 246 was Consecrated in 30th Apr 2011 to honor him.

The Book of Enoch contains the truth about the geocentric Earth and it's relation to the sun and moon.

Copernicus was a Fraud, Godlike Productions 9 Comments [8/2/2015 5:06:17 AM]
Fundie Index: 6
WTF?! | meh

Username (Login)

Comment (Text formatting help)

I'm not a spambot
Submit Comment

1 | bottom
#1838863


Talk about flogging a dead horse.

8/2/2015 5:15:32 AM
#1838878
Spamming Tanks

Does he think the moon landing was a hoax?

I bet he does! :D

8/2/2015 5:54:46 AM
#1838934
Kanna

...and THIS, folks, is why the bible is not used in science classes! Moving right along....

8/2/2015 8:06:52 AM
#1838986
TimeToTurn

Freemasons also founded America. So why do you hate America?

I wouldn't trust Alexander von Humboldt's thoughts on heliocentrism any more than I would trust Jason Lisle's thoughts on evolution. Humboldt wasn't an astronomer, after all.

8/2/2015 9:35:09 AM
#1839026
NotaReptile

So explain the movements of the planets, if geocentric were true, we'd see them progress in ellipses around the planet.

What is observed however is that the planets when viewed from earth have loops, which is exactly what you'd expect from objects that are orbiting concentrically.

Now its interesting to note that heliocentric isn't exactly true. The true center of the orbits of our solar system would be the collected center of mass of all objects in the solar system. This center of mass is very close to the center of the sun, but is offset by the mass of the planets (mostly Jupiter). Its so close that for all intents and purposes outside of sensitive measurements, you'd be perfectly fine saying that the Sun is the center of the solar system.

8/2/2015 10:56:00 AM
#1839521
Doubting Thomas

Bernard Cohen in Birth of a New Physics, 1960, concurs

I smell quote mining. Please give us the rest of the quote.

And nice that you can't find a source newer than 1960 which even remotely agrees with you, even if it is a quote mine.

8/3/2015 9:34:12 AM
#1839999
Wyzard

I wonder if the OP also believes in a flat earth?

Or the firmament of water above?

8/4/2015 5:18:39 PM
#1920662
Kuno

Both alleged quotes can be found only on crank sites.

3/4/2016 3:52:26 AM
#1920843
Bill

I bet if the Bible said that he could drink poison and not die from it, he'd believe that, too, wait a minute or does say that, in Mark 16:16, so why doesn't he do it? Is is faith not strong enough? Or does even he, at some level, understand that his belief system is just as bad as the one he criticises?

3/4/2016 6:36:21 PM
1 | top: comments page