Why is it ok to post written pornography but not images of pornography here?

How is it different?

@zerofuks2give: [c=#BF0080]I don't think I have to explain do I.. 🤔[/c]

@pinkrainbowkisses: sure. Convince me how it's different

I think porn brings with it the legacy of objectifying women and exploiting minors.
Since erotica is between writer and reader, chances for exploitation are minimal.

I could be way off base, but this is kinda how I see it. Porn is just way too risky.

@zerofuks2give: not really

what's more disgusting?:
a] reading about kittens being eaten alive
b] looking at a guy eating kittens alive

with "a" you can stop reading
with "b" in milliseconds it's in your brain forever!

@Th1nkF1rst: as soon as I read something the image is in my brain, so I really don't agree with that

@pinkrainbowkisses: but there is tons of written porn already on here so what's the difference?

@zerofuks2give: [c=#BF0080]Written porn I can just read a sentence to know it's not something I want to read.. I have no mental image of it and can scroll past it. A pic doesn't allow me to do that.. it's right there for all to see and I have no choice but to look at it.. you can scroll past it but you've already seen it regardless. [/c]

@pinkrainbowkisses: fair enough but isn't that why there is a rating system in place?

not with the pictures being blurred on SW at least.
you don't HAVE to look at it. at least in PM, that is.

@agreatday: [c=#BF0080]In the public forum nothings blurred..[/c]

@pinkrainbowkisses: yeah, I thought of that after I wrote my comment. I should've edited it.