Science Really Does Point To God [Spirituality & Religion]
[youtube=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t60MBskbNuc] No Question About It.
61-69, M
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
JoeyFoxx · 51-55, M
What a weak minded idiot.
What science is discovering is that life on Earth is a statistical anomaly, that the odds for sustained life are so amazingly low, that we are learning how very much alone in the universe we are.
And that god cannot protect us from ourselves.
Ironic that the religious folks who support Trump and others like him who deny climate change are the ones who are hoping that god will save us.
Ain’t gonna happen my friend.
Next up; how lottery winners are determined by the sky man.
What science is discovering is that life on Earth is a statistical anomaly, that the odds for sustained life are so amazingly low, that we are learning how very much alone in the universe we are.
And that god cannot protect us from ourselves.
Ironic that the religious folks who support Trump and others like him who deny climate change are the ones who are hoping that god will save us.
Ain’t gonna happen my friend.
Next up; how lottery winners are determined by the sky man.
JoeyFoxx · 51-55, M
This isn’t a contest.
This is a discussion about facts vs fantasy.
A vast majority of scientists are not fascinated and amazed by science where they are concluding that there must be divine intervention.
It’s simply not the case and is the basis for this clown’s conclusion.
Go ahead and remove the Cheeto’s name from my post and insert any other denier of climate change.
The fact that you think that this is a game is quite sad.
@hippyjoe1955
This is a discussion about facts vs fantasy.
A vast majority of scientists are not fascinated and amazed by science where they are concluding that there must be divine intervention.
It’s simply not the case and is the basis for this clown’s conclusion.
Go ahead and remove the Cheeto’s name from my post and insert any other denier of climate change.
The fact that you think that this is a game is quite sad.
@hippyjoe1955
hippyjoe1955 · 61-69, M
@GodSpeed63 The vast majority of scientists is a logical fallacy. Nice try though. I see logic is not your forte.
GodSpeed63 · 61-69, M
@JoeyFoxx [quote]This is a discussion about facts vs fantasy. [/quote]
Thank you. Now, show me how science points away from God, Yahweh.
Thank you. Now, show me how science points away from God, Yahweh.
GodSpeed63 · 61-69, M
@JoeyFoxx [quote]Is that the best YOU can do? @GodSpeed63[/quote]
Yahweh doesn't have to prove Himself to anybody. He's left us enough evidence so that we're without excuse.
Yahweh doesn't have to prove Himself to anybody. He's left us enough evidence so that we're without excuse.
JoeyFoxx · 51-55, M
@GodSpeed63 [quote]Thank you. Now, show me how science points away from God, Yahweh.[/quote]
At best, science cannot explain the literal Big Bang, so it cannot rule out some omnipotent cause of that.
But everything since the Big Bang can be explained with science.
Which contradicts the literal stories of religious explanations of the formation of the earth. There is zero evidence of unexplainable events since the Big Bang, which is very difficult to measure since no one was there to measure it.
So, perhaps science can show that your god did something great. Once. Billions of years ago. And left you with the aftermath.
Happy?
At best, science cannot explain the literal Big Bang, so it cannot rule out some omnipotent cause of that.
But everything since the Big Bang can be explained with science.
Which contradicts the literal stories of religious explanations of the formation of the earth. There is zero evidence of unexplainable events since the Big Bang, which is very difficult to measure since no one was there to measure it.
So, perhaps science can show that your god did something great. Once. Billions of years ago. And left you with the aftermath.
Happy?
GodSpeed63 · 61-69, M
@JoeyFoxx [quote]At best, science cannot explain the literal Big Bang, so it cannot rule out some omnipotent cause of that. But everything since the Big Bang can be explained with science. [/quote]
That makes about as much sense as 2+2=5. You choose to believe in the big bang without knowing if it actually happened or not. Yet, I present Yahweh, the true God who lives forever, to you and you tell me that I'm lying. Again, without really knowing whether He lives or not.
Good Grief! I feel sorry for you, friend, you haven't a clue of what you're saying.
That makes about as much sense as 2+2=5. You choose to believe in the big bang without knowing if it actually happened or not. Yet, I present Yahweh, the true God who lives forever, to you and you tell me that I'm lying. Again, without really knowing whether He lives or not.
Good Grief! I feel sorry for you, friend, you haven't a clue of what you're saying.
JoeyFoxx · 51-55, M
Nice attempt to twist.
We have more evidence of the Big Bang than we have of some supernatural deity. Therefore, I gravitate to where there is more evidence.
In fact, there is no evidence of a deity.
All we have is a lack of understanding of what happened before the Big Bang or what caused it.
I feel sorry for you that you believe there is logic to your assessments.
@GodSpeed63
We have more evidence of the Big Bang than we have of some supernatural deity. Therefore, I gravitate to where there is more evidence.
In fact, there is no evidence of a deity.
All we have is a lack of understanding of what happened before the Big Bang or what caused it.
I feel sorry for you that you believe there is logic to your assessments.
@GodSpeed63
GodSpeed63 · 61-69, M
@JoeyFoxx [quote]Nice attempt to twist.[/quote]
That was not my intention. I was hoping you'd see how fatuous you sound.
That was not my intention. I was hoping you'd see how fatuous you sound.
JoeyFoxx · 51-55, M
So you were hoping that I would see something that isn’t there?
Like your hope that I believe in a god?
@GodSpeed63
Like your hope that I believe in a god?
@GodSpeed63
GodSpeed63 · 61-69, M
@JoeyFoxx [quote]So you were hoping that I would see something that isn’t there?[/quote]
No, I was hoping you'd see your reasoning as fatuous. If you can't prove the one true God, Yahweh, doesn't live, the how do you know He doesn't live? Now, I'm talking about Yahweh, who lives forever and was never created by man or other god. You can say otherwise but it wouldn't change that fact.
No, I was hoping you'd see your reasoning as fatuous. If you can't prove the one true God, Yahweh, doesn't live, the how do you know He doesn't live? Now, I'm talking about Yahweh, who lives forever and was never created by man or other god. You can say otherwise but it wouldn't change that fact.
JoeyFoxx · 51-55, M
You can’t prove that “Yahweh” is different than “Allah” or any of the other man made gods.
You claim there is no reason to prove that your god exists. And yet you cling so desperately to an irrational claim that science is proving the existence of god, when the reverse is actually the truth.
@GodSpeed63
You claim there is no reason to prove that your god exists. And yet you cling so desperately to an irrational claim that science is proving the existence of god, when the reverse is actually the truth.
@GodSpeed63
hippyjoe1955 · 61-69, M
@JoeyFoxx Anyone who says that has never studied either. Too funny!!