The Case For God [Spirituality & Religion]
They can say, there is no God all they like, but it wouldn't be the truth.
[youtube=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ajqH4y8G0MI]
[youtube=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ajqH4y8G0MI]
61-69, M
Top | Newest First | Oldest First
newjaninev2 · 56-60, F
A drawn-out, very tedious splurging of CGI, sophistry, and selective omissions.
How old is this nonsense? It seems to be centred around the Argument from Personal Astonishment ([i]i.e.[/i] I don't understand what I'm looking at, therefore magical entities exist).
It has Behe rabbiting on about bacterial flagella and trying to present that as an example of irreducible complexity! Oh, seriously? That has long been discredited, and the evolutionary development of the bacterial flagellum is well-understood.
This pap even makes the claim that Behe (and 'others'!) have identified examples of irreducible complexity... yes, states that lie without a shred of shame... [i]even though creationists have yet to present even a single example of irreducible complexity[/I]. (Behe now avoids the topic).
Don't you have anything from this century (or even from the later decades of the last century?)
How old is this nonsense? It seems to be centred around the Argument from Personal Astonishment ([i]i.e.[/i] I don't understand what I'm looking at, therefore magical entities exist).
It has Behe rabbiting on about bacterial flagella and trying to present that as an example of irreducible complexity! Oh, seriously? That has long been discredited, and the evolutionary development of the bacterial flagellum is well-understood.
This pap even makes the claim that Behe (and 'others'!) have identified examples of irreducible complexity... yes, states that lie without a shred of shame... [i]even though creationists have yet to present even a single example of irreducible complexity[/I]. (Behe now avoids the topic).
Don't you have anything from this century (or even from the later decades of the last century?)
View 10 more replies »
Bushranger · 70-79, M
suzie1960 · 61-69, F
@redredred [quote]If irreducible complexity were proof of the need for a creator, your god would need a creator and so on ad infinitum.[/quote]
Of course. They can't or refuse to understand that any claim they make in respect of their god could just as easily be applied to the universe itself, thus rendering their god redundant. It's nothing more than an unnecessary complication.
Of course. They can't or refuse to understand that any claim they make in respect of their god could just as easily be applied to the universe itself, thus rendering their god redundant. It's nothing more than an unnecessary complication.
CookieLuvsBunny · 31-35, F
@newjaninev2 @suzie1960 @GodSpeed63 @Bushranger The irreducible complexity argument is a proven fallacy. Any biological entity thought to be irreducible has, in fact, been reduced
GodSpeed63 · 61-69, M
@suzie1960 [quote]That says a lot about you.[/quote]
Yes, it does. I respect God and He's given me knowledge plenty of times. You, on the other hand, appear to despise wisdom and instruction. It's no insult, it's a fact.
Yes, it does. I respect God and He's given me knowledge plenty of times. You, on the other hand, appear to despise wisdom and instruction. It's no insult, it's a fact.
redredred · M
I understand full well the disastrous effects of believing in this bronze age myth of a god. Millions have gone to their deaths or lived as slaves because if this myth and the human monsters that perpetuate it. Not a shred of proof has ever been presented for the existence of this god you worship as you and billions of others revel in your astounding ignorance.
Prove your god or shut up. Anecdotal evidence and worthless scripture are not proof. Theres plenty of that for Santa Claus and the Easter Bunny.@GodSpeed63
Prove your god or shut up. Anecdotal evidence and worthless scripture are not proof. Theres plenty of that for Santa Claus and the Easter Bunny.@GodSpeed63
GoldButterfly · F
GodSpeed63 · 61-69, M
@GoldButterfly Let's hope it's not too late for them.
GoldButterfly · F
@GodSpeed63 It will be for many.
GodSpeed63 · 61-69, M
@GoldButterfly Yeah. That's always been the sad part.