What the hell is wrong with people? Iqra Khalid sponsors a motion for anti-islamophobia and she gets hatemail and death threats?

@puck61:

Shh shh shh.
You're done, nutbar
Off you go...
😉

@UnparalleledMonster: No you're done! You, unfortunately, are going to reap what you sew. You are an unparalleled fool among unparalleled fools. You will will eat the fruit of your own foolishness. Good night nutbar.

@puck61: Yes. I 'did' get a case of tunnel vision, but the fact remains that you condone someone who would have the audacity to try and regulate thought. This is the left at it's worst, and it is no wonder this person has received death threats. This whole 'thought police' thing is worthy of death threats. Especially when it is something like "Islamophobia" which is a perfectly natural reaction to a dangerous and destructive belief system. Islam is no different from Nazism. Islam is destroying countries and cultures, not to mention, priceless archaeological artifacts, and historical records. Every country where Islam becomes predominant is completely ruined and no longer worthwhile. Islam is a cancer on the earth.

Well, if you're looking for stats on how many muslims approve of terror attacks you might want to look at a site that is unbiased. I'm pretty sure a site called "religion of peace" is not unbiased. In fact, the very name implies a bias. But you go right ahead and believe whatever you choose to believe. I don't give a fuck.

@katielass:

[quote] I'm pretty sure a site called "religion of peace" is not unbiased. In fact, the very name implies a bias[/quote]

Haaahahahaha!
Oh you [i]hilarious[/i] little imbecile.😂
So in addition to being unable to provide any data in support of your claim, you didn't even follow the link to the data that[i] could[/i] be found!

Well you're right. It IS a biased site. Very much so.
It's biased on the same side you are : Islam is terrible and muslims are evil.
And the data [i]still[/i] didn't support your claim.

lol you're a bit of a joke, aren't you katie?
Well i'm laughing, anyway.

Feel free to do your little tap dance of saving face now 😆😆🤣

@katielass:

Oh, nothing to say?
lol thought not.

Let's say it does support their political agenda.
When is it a bad thing to advocate for less hate in your community?
What kind of person gets upset by that?
Besides pcuk61, obviously lol

@UnparalleledMonster: It is not a bad thing to advocate less but hate.
The feeling of anger and hate is caused by the concurrence of these two circumstances
1- The sensation that the government does not care about the bulk of the population who are not in a good financial position..
2- The sensation that the government cares only about some minorities

@Cierzo:


I see what you're saying. But i think that if you're upset to the point of sending hate mail and death threats then you've got more problems to worry about than that the government cares about minority discrimination

I will never get over what complete idiots you all are/

It's just symbolic. Taking a stand against discrimination, assault and hate crime

@UnparalleledMonster: No problem with taking a stand against hate crimes but rather odd to choose a type that constitutes 4/10 of one percent to make a point. Jews are the most common hate crime victim. And most of the so called islamophobic hate crimes turn out to be a hoax.

@katielass:


Yeah yeah. Same logic applies when whiners shout down any feminist issue in north america because women elsewhere have it so much worse.
Bit of a facile argument, yeah?

Anyway, this motion comes on the heals of the hoax where 6 muslims were shot to death and 8 others wounded while they worshiped in their quebec city mosque.
So no, i DON'T think it's "rather odd" for a canadian mp to be addressing this specific issue right now and nor should you.