Can someone explain how Trump will be reinstated?
I'm not looking for liberals to explain why it can't happen; I already know that. I'm interested in genuine Trump supporters explaining the constitutional basis for how this is supposed to work.
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
LeopoldBloom · M
OK, this is how I understand the theory.
1. The Cyber Ninjas (I swear to God, that's what the company's name is) finishes their "audit" of the votes in Arizona, and reports that Trump won the state, by, like, a lot. Like by a million votes.
2. A similar audit is conducted in Georgia, Pennsylvania, and a few other states Trump lost, with similar results.
3. This crap is taken as "proof" that Trump won the election in a landslide.
4. The "evidence" is brought before the Supreme Court, which mumble mumble Constitution something something declares Trump the winner.
5. Biden is forcibly removed from the White House and Trump sworn in as the 19th President of the United States (since every president since Grant, including Trump himself, was invalid for some reason).
1. The Cyber Ninjas (I swear to God, that's what the company's name is) finishes their "audit" of the votes in Arizona, and reports that Trump won the state, by, like, a lot. Like by a million votes.
2. A similar audit is conducted in Georgia, Pennsylvania, and a few other states Trump lost, with similar results.
3. This crap is taken as "proof" that Trump won the election in a landslide.
4. The "evidence" is brought before the Supreme Court, which mumble mumble Constitution something something declares Trump the winner.
5. Biden is forcibly removed from the White House and Trump sworn in as the 19th President of the United States (since every president since Grant, including Trump himself, was invalid for some reason).
ididntknow · 51-55, M
@LeopoldBloom so, let me ask you, what proof would you need, to prove the fraud
ididntknow · 51-55, M
@LeopoldBloom reading your posts, are you Rachel Maddow
LeopoldBloom · M
@ididntknow What proof would you need to accept that there was no fraud?
However, arguing about the "fraud" is a different issue than how Traitor Tot is "reinstated." Even if Joe Biden admits to masterminding a plot to throw out millions of Trump votes, and says that he actually lost the election, it's too late. Congress certified the electoral votes and Biden was sworn in, and his term doesn't end until noon on January 20, 2025. You cult members need to accept reality.
However, arguing about the "fraud" is a different issue than how Traitor Tot is "reinstated." Even if Joe Biden admits to masterminding a plot to throw out millions of Trump votes, and says that he actually lost the election, it's too late. Congress certified the electoral votes and Biden was sworn in, and his term doesn't end until noon on January 20, 2025. You cult members need to accept reality.
LeopoldBloom · M
@ididntknow Reading your posts, are you Rudy Giuliani?
ididntknow · 51-55, M
@LeopoldBloom you clearly believe Biden won the election, honestly and fairly, and you’re not prepared to think any differently, what you are saying, is that if it comes out there was cheating, you won’t believe it anyway, how can you have a serous discussion with a person, like that,
LeopoldBloom · M
@ididntknow And you think Traitor Tot won the election and was cheated. It's not possible to have a rational discussion with a lunatic like you who refuses to accept reality.
There is literally no evidence that the election wasn't valid. If there was, Trump should have brought that evidence to court when there was still time to reverse the results. Bringing up "cheating" now is pointless and unproductive.
There is literally no evidence that the election wasn't valid. If there was, Trump should have brought that evidence to court when there was still time to reverse the results. Bringing up "cheating" now is pointless and unproductive.