This is how Dominion conspired with the DNC and media to steal the election:

Pennsylvania: Tampering: 220,883 Lost votes: 941,248
New Jersey: Tampering: 80,242 Lost votes: 20
Florida: Tampering: 21,422 Lost Votes: 456
Michigan: Tampering: 20,213 Lost votes: 21,882
New York: Tampering: 18124 Lost votes: 623213
Georgia: tampering: 17,407 lost votes: 33,574
Ohio: Tampering: 14,965 Lost votes: 5,102
Virginia: Tampering: 12,163 Lost Votes: 789,023
California: Tampered 7,701 Lost votes: 10,989
Arizona: Tampering: 4,492 lost votes: 0
Minnesota: Tampering: 2,766 lost votes: 195,650
Tennessee: Tampering: 2,330 Lost Votes: 0
Louisiana: Tampering: 2,322 Lost Votes : 0
Illinois: Tampering: 2,166 Lost votes: 54,730
Wisconsin: Tampering: 2,078 Lost votes: 3,408
Colorado: Tampered: 1,809 Lost votes: 0
Utah: Tampering: 1,627 Lost Votes: 0
New Hampshire: Tampering: 973 Lost Votes: 116
Iowa: Tampering: 938 Lost votes: 477
New Mexico: Tampering: 268 Lost votes: 4,610
Missouri: Tampering 0: Lost Votes: 20,730
Nevada: Tampering: 0 Lost Votes: 0
Alaska: Tampering: 0 Lost Votes: 0
Washington State: Tampering: 0 lost votes: 0
Hawaii: Tampering: 0 Lost votes: 0

This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »

Tracos · 51-55, M

do you have a credible source for this?

jackjjackson · 61-69, M

Scroll up. The source is listed. @Tracos

Tracos · 51-55, M

@jackjjackson I dont see it... do you have a link ?

Tracos · 51-55, M

@jackjjackson ah this one.. .not sure if I would qualify that as a neutral source though...
https://gnews.org/558392/

Tracos · 51-55, M

@jackjjackson so from the same page... how would you interpret this part?

jackjjackson · 61-69, M

I'm pretty sure the internet has not appointed you source czar. When a person requests a source then gets one and fails to come up with a contrary source and simply name calls the real source it clearly establishes that person's (in this case you) lack of intelligence. @Tracos

Tracos · 51-55, M

@jackjjackson thank you so much for your kind clarification :)

jackjjackson · 61-69, M

I currently don't feel inclined to guess. What is your interpretation? @Tracos

Tracos · 51-55, M

@jackjjackson I have none.. .I just challenge the websites origins, since it appears to stand far away (at least a continent far away) from anything remotely US official.

a website riddled with chinese characters listing 'A web god named TrumanBlack' as a credible source does not feel like a solid foundation or reference for official or unofficial US ballot numbers. but that might be my lack of intelligence you so kindly pointed out