Did this actually happen? | Politics

hunkalove · 61-69, M

She's a little too rootin' tootin' wacko?

+ 9

· Reply · Oct 29, 2016 |

SW User

THIS!

+ 2

· Reply · Oct 29, 2016 |

Flenflyys · 26-30, F

Maybe she was wrong? I've also seen her mention that if Clinton wins there will be a civil war

+ 3

· Reply · Oct 29, 2016 |

RootinTootinHighFalutin · 31-35, F

@Flenflyys: Bon appétit. 😉

+ 0 · Reply · Oct 29, 2016 |

adshaw · 31-35, M

@Flenflyys: You'd do well to save essentials like underpants. In a civil war even Super Target won't be safe.

+ 0 · Reply · Oct 29, 2016 |

Flenflyys · 26-30, F

I'm Canadian our underpants is woolen and covers our entire body

+ 0 · Reply · Oct 29, 2016 |

JaggedLittlePill · 41-45, F

Because she is full of shit

+ 8

· Reply · Oct 29, 2016 |

adshaw · 31-35, M

Voting via machine is dodgy to begin with.

+ 1

· Reply · Oct 29, 2016 |

hunkalove · 61-69, M

Let's never forget how the Bush people cheated in Florida in 2000. Dangling chads! It can happen.

+ 1

· Reply · Oct 29, 2016 |

adshaw · 31-35, M

@hunkalove: Yes, either side can manipulate it. A recipe for disaster.

+ 1

· Reply · Oct 29, 2016 |

Geminyoureye · F

ohhhi know her

+ 1

· Reply · Oct 29, 2016 |

RootinTootinHighFalutin · 31-35, F

😜

+ 0 · Reply · Oct 29, 2016 |

dystopianAntihero · 51-55, M

Sorry, but you're incorrect. The same happened during the primaries. You're incorrect to state that this has been disproven when in fact the opposite is the case. An election justice atty who prevented the 2012 elections fr being stolen by Karl Rove on behalf of Romney file a RICO lawsuit proving massive voter fraud in at least 11 states.

Election fraud in CA and Chicago has been proven. The Chicago results have long since been overturned in favor of of Sanders and CA's Registrar of Voter's got booted out of OH for voter for fraud, and two ppl who were under him in OH took the fall for it. There is also an ongoing DOJ investigation re AZ fraud made at the request of the AZ SoS, and Bill Clinton has had two separate lawsuits foiled against him for illegal electioneering in AZ and MA.

All of these things are verifiable facts. I d be more than happy to provide documentation. The reason that media doesn't report on these things is the both the media and the system are corrupt. The media is made up of transnational corporations, and represents corporate interests. It's not conspiratorial, it's ideological, the rich and powerful represent powerful interests, not the interests of the people. Google Noam Chomsky's propaganda model and visit Project Censored for an overview of how and why media censorship takes place.

That said, as corrupt as Clinton is, Trump is not only worse, but if the Dems take the WH and the Senanate Bernie Sanders will become head of the Senate Budget Committee, which will give him leverage to continue his progressive revolution. So I'll be votingvfor Clinton, not bc I endorse fraud and corruption, but bc she is center left and has endorsed modified version of his programs. As resistant as she's been to his far left progressive agenda, as a neoliberal, Trump would be far more resistant, is hostile to minorities and wishes to abolish social programs.

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_IAJ5fAm3Cs]

+ 0 · Reply · Oct 29, 2016 |

dystopianAntihero · 51-55, M

No, bias is not rigging it's the reason for it. You're the one who's making themselves look like a Trump supporter, they can't be reasoned w either. And I may be voting for Clinton, but I'm certainly not a Clinton sopproter, and I'm certainly not voting for her bc she deserves it.

+ 0 · Reply · Oct 29, 2016 |

Edited: 3 yrs ago

ladycae · 100+, F

niether am i but you claimed

[quote]Btw, it's already come out that the former DNC chair, Debbie Wassman Schultz, was involved in rigging the primaries[/quote]

and that was incorrect. the dnc was biased but they did nothing to actually rig the election. i am biased against trump that does not mean i am rigging the election. i am biased against hard boiled eggs that does not mean i am stopping you from eating them. People are biased against many things, that does not mean they prevent others from doing, being, r thinking those things

+ 1

· Reply · Oct 29, 2016 |

dystopianAntihero · 51-55, M

For the umpteenth time, the bias was the reason for rigging the nomination process. You don't seem to grasp the difference between rigging the nomination process and rigging the election, which are two different things. The OP asked a legitimate question and deserved an honest answer, something that you have no interest in, nor are you capable of goving one. I'm tired of you ignorant, trolling rambling, so you're getting blocked.

+ 0 · Reply · Oct 30, 2016 |

ladycae · 100+, F

there is no way she could know. texchik just likes making big broad accusations with no basis in fact.

+ 0 · Reply · Oct 29, 2016 |

Xuan12 · 31-35, M

She's probably making it up. A similar story came up in the news a while ago, but in that instance they just fixed the ballot. Even if it does happen, just fix it. I've always used paper ballots anyway.