Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Would having Mrs Warren on the ticket in 2020 doom the Dems?

[image deleted]
This page is a permanent link to the reply below and its nested replies. See all post replies »
eli1601 · 70-79, M
If she became President would it be the first time that "Hail to the Chief" was based on reality
Abrienda · 26-30, F
Oh God that was good!@eli1601
jackjjackson · 61-69, M
[image deleted]@Abrienda
@jackjjackson If this is the worst thing you can come up with, we might as well just appoint her president already because she's nearly perfect. Maybe try to come up with a substantial criticism of her policy positions, other than "she's a liberal?" Oh, wait, you can't, because you don't have the slightest idea what they are.

Her big issue has been government corruption and the impact of finance on the middle class. If you weren't brainwashed and could actually look at her rationally, you'd support her.
jackjjackson · 61-69, M
Mrs Warren screeches about a number of things. As of 98% of democrats favor candidates not named Mrs Warren. @LeopoldBloom
@jackjjackson OK, so you don't know shit about her. That's fine, all you need to know about any of them is that they're not Cheeto Benito.

None of them are breaking out of the pack. The field will thin out soon enough. For example, Tulsi Gabbard is already history, and someone else formally withdrew a few weeks ago. The ones declaring now are trying to snap up the best campaign managers; if they wait too long, none of the good ones will be left.

If Bernie enters the race, he will be the immediate front runner.
jackjjackson · 61-69, M
Gabbard is still in and quite hot in the surfing videos. Sanders is over the hill and has zero chance. @LeopoldBloom
@jackjjackson Gabbard is a cult member and has a history of anti-LGBT positions, way beyond just not supporting same-sex marriage, but actually anti-gay. She also sucked up to Trump after he was elected, hoping for a cabinet position. Lyndon LaRouche has a better chance at the nomination than she does, and he just died. But thanks for demonstrating that your only criterion is that a woman is hot. I guess you'll be voting for Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez.

The only reason Sanders won't run is because he doesn't need to. His positions in 2016 are mainstream today.
jackjjackson · 61-69, M
So you lied by claiming Gabbard dropped out. Sanders has sex abuse allegations still unresoived from his 2016 loss. @LeopoldBloom
@jackjjackson She’s about to drop out.

Sanders’ sex abuse allegations don’t involve him directly, they involve a few staffers and no one has said he was aware of them. If President Pussy Grabber can get away with that, it’s a non-issue for Sanders.
jackjjackson · 61-69, M
Keep on backtracking uninformed rocket scientists like you that write grandiose statements that are debunked end up as debunked windbags. I recommend changing your user name to reflect that. @LeopoldBloom
@jackjjackson Please, you're the ignoramus.

Name three policies of Warren's that you disagree with. I'll bet you can't even think of one. All you know about her is she's female, a Democrat, and used to say she was part Cherokee. That's like someone saying they don't like Trump because he has a funny hairdo.

Seriously, the people who care that Warren misstated her racial background, or some Sanders staffer was rude to another female staffer, wouldn't vote for either of them anyway. And the people who support them don't give a fuck.

Trump was being sued during the campaign by a woman who claimed he raped her when she was 13. You probably don't even know about that, not that it would have made any difference to you. Trump could rape your grandmother, and your response would be "well, I'm sure he had a good reason."
jackjjackson · 61-69, M
No lawsuits against the President have been found to have any merit. Re Mrs Warren:

Her claimed goal to end DC corruption is deceptive. Mrs Warren IS DC corruption.

Mrs Warren claims to want to help the middle class. Mrs Warren is an elitist.

Mrs Warren wants to level the playing field however accepts Wall teett Street money. Hypocrite.

I could go on.



@LeopoldBloom
This message was deleted by the author of the main post.
jackjjackson · 61-69, M
Let’s see you ask for substance. You are given substance. You’re unable to rebut it and resort to off topic filth. Sorry not acceptable. @LeopoldBloom
Abrienda · 26-30, F
@jackjjackson No, never acceptable but yes always typical with this mentality.
jackjjackson · 61-69, M
Their “mentality” is in fact a severely split plurality at most. @Abrienda
Abrienda · 26-30, F
@jackjjackson You realize of course as I now do that they have a complete break with reality? Not just from human history over the past 2,000 years but from what they can see today with their own eyes?

It is in fact a complete mental and emotional disorder. Here is an example. Yesterday I had to end a friendship here with someone who said HE knew more about the end of Communism in Central Europe than not only I did but also Lech Walesa, Vaclav Havel or the Cardinal of Krakow who all credit Ronald Raegan for their freedom from Communism and the Soviet Union, saying straight out they were WRONG and Reagan had NOTHING to do with it!!

Now...is that a sign of delusional thinking and paranoia or what?
jackjjackson · 61-69, M
It sure is. @Abrienda
Abrienda · 26-30, F
@jackjjackson However you see it on the media and here every day...
jackjjackson · 61-69, M
They have an agenda and believe that if they repeat the same lie often enough it will work. However there are people who pay attention and live in the real world so ultimately that horrendous plan will not work. @Abrienda
Abrienda · 26-30, F
@jackjjackson Yes an insane agenda,

You are right and to do it they must first destroy the education system and then question all truth and make all things subjective or relative...like gender.
This message was deleted by the author of the main post.
jackjjackson · 61-69, M
The topic is Mrs Warren. Comments regarding her are welcome Senor sock puppet. @LeopoldBloom
@jackjjackson We're talking about Senator Warren? You could have fooled me. You haven't said anything substantive about her yourself yet.
jackjjackson · 61-69, M
You’re the only commenter who isn’t on topic and whose sole purpose is stalking. @LeopoldBloom