Can the WH get it's story straight, ever?
Remember the good old days when it was announced Jim Comey would be sacked because of his handling of his oversight into Clinton and his press conference about it just before the election? And then later Trump tells Lester Holt on TV that he fired him because of the 'Russia thing' and Flynn?
This morning the NYT have posted a story that after Comey was fired, the FBI launched an investigation into the possibility that Trump was a Russian agent (Because at the time firing Comey basically shut down any investigation into Flynn/Russia).
Naturally the liar's spokesbitch Saunders attacks Comey; And Trump in his typical pretzel twist of logic, accepts the NYT story as factual at the same time as saying it's failing (It isn't actually-Since Trump took office the circulation has increased!)...So is it fake news and therefore the FBI story is false, or factual and therefore not fake? 馃
This morning the NYT have posted a story that after Comey was fired, the FBI launched an investigation into the possibility that Trump was a Russian agent (Because at the time firing Comey basically shut down any investigation into Flynn/Russia).
Naturally the liar's spokesbitch Saunders attacks Comey; And Trump in his typical pretzel twist of logic, accepts the NYT story as factual at the same time as saying it's failing (It isn't actually-Since Trump took office the circulation has increased!)...So is it fake news and therefore the FBI story is false, or factual and therefore not fake? 馃
