It's Friday

He knows, because this is the summary Fox gave him @frequentlyme

@Northwest Yah, heavens forbid he actually read anything... I'm half way through it and I find it a fascinating look into the mind of man with a high set of standards, who has long battled the body politic, and of course, his own shortcomings. An interesting read.

@easypeasy Over a year later, your comment still rings true. I can think of a few countries, including one run by a wannabe czar! 😂

@beckyromero Thank you, once more, for re-posting quotes from Judith Miller, to prove nothing.

[quote]If you're interested in partisanship, keep doing what you're doing.[/quote]
You don't know anything about me, so I suggest you not go there.

[quote]why in the world would you "take the stand"?[/quote]

The question is why he did not take the stand. While Armitage and Cheney may be equally guilty, it does not absolve Libby. He would not take the stand, because he will further perjure himself.

@Northwest [quote]The question is why he did not take the stand.[/quote]

Libby never leaked Plame's name. The prosecutor [b]WANTED[/b] him to perjure himself by testifying that he leaked her name. That's why he never took the stand. He would have been forced to answer that question. If he truthfully answered, "No," he would have been hit with another perjury charge. If he [b]LIED[/b] and said "Yes" that would have been perjury as well. Since the prosecutor [b]KNEW[/b] that wouldn't have been the truth as he knew Libby didn't leak Plame's name.

If you fear the government is already wrongly prosecuting you and [b]WANTS[/b] you to perjure yourself by wrongfully testifying about something you did [b]NOT[/b] do, maybe [b]YOU[/b] can explain why someone in that position would take the stand?

This is what infuriated Cheney so much, that President Bush only commuted Libby's sentence instead of a issuing a full pardon. Of course, Bush didn't have the hindsight about Judith Miller's discovery since that came after he left office.

We've seen it over and over. When the government doesn't have enough evidence to initially convict someone, they force them to testify over and over and then nail them for perjury. People aren't computer with brains than never make mistakes in recalling minute details, as Judith Miller later recounted.

This is where I say, I’m done with the hair splitter @beckyromero

The view is one example lol @Northwest

@jackjjackson sorry, I don’t watch the view

Me either. It’s part of Comey’s Book tour. @Northwest

@SW-User Here's a hint for you, if you don't care, don't read the politics section, but mostly though, don't pretend you don't care, by taking the time to post some stupid meme, to prove you don't care.