Sad
Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

More than 60% of Americans are living paycheck to paycheck.

[b]CBS News[/b] (August 2023, Money Watch, Bidenomics))

[b]About 61% of Americans are living paycheck to paycheck, an issue that impacts both low-wage and high-income families alike, according to new research from LendingClub.

Low-wage earners are most likely to live paycheck to paycheck, with almost 8 in 10 consumers earning less than $50,000 a year unable to cover their future bills until their next paycheck arrives. Yet even 4 in 10 high-income Americans, or those earning more than $100,000, say they're in the same position, the research found.

Such a situation is viewed as financially risky because it means those households don't have enough savings to tide them over in case of an emergency, indicating that they are unable to cover their upcoming bills until their next payday. The rate of Americans who are living paycheck to paycheck is on the rise, up 2 percentage points from a year earlier, the analysis found.[/b]

[b]Inflation is partly to blame, with consumers still grappling with higher prices — although prices have cooled since hitting a 40-year high of 9.1% in June 2022. But a minority of paycheck-to-paycheck consumers point to another issue that's impacting their financial stability: nonessential spending on items such as travel, eating out and streaming services, the analysis found.[/b]

[b]About 61% of Americans are living paycheck to paycheck, an issue that impacts both low-wage and high-income families alike, according to new research from LendingClub.

Low-wage earners are most likely to live paycheck to paycheck, with almost 8 in 10 consumers earning less than $50,000 a year unable to cover their future bills until their next paycheck arrives. Yet even 4 in 10 high-income Americans, or those earning more than $100,000, say they're in the same position, the research found.

Such a situation is viewed as financially risky because it means those households don't have enough savings to tide them over in case of an emergency, indicating that they are unable to cover their upcoming bills until their next payday. The rate of Americans who are living paycheck to paycheck is on the rise, up 2 percentage points from a year earlier, the analysis found.


Inflation is partly to blame, with consumers still grappling with higher prices — although prices have cooled since hitting a 40-year high of 9.1% in June 2022. But a minority of paycheck-to-paycheck consumers point to another issue that's impacting their financial stability: nonessential spending on items such as travel, eating out and streaming services, the analysis found.

Beyond the basic necessities
"According to 21% of paycheck- to-paycheck consumers, nonessential spending is one reason for their financial lifestyle, with 10% saying it is their top reason for living paycheck to paycheck," the report noted. "This factor is significant: Consumers, despite financial challenges and tighter budgets, indulge in nonessential spending when possible."

Still, the majority of paycheck-to-paycheck consumers aren't splurging or spending on things beyond the basic necessities. And those essentials alone can quickly eat up a worker's paycheck. [/b]


[b]U.S. workers earn median pay of $4,766 per month before taxes, according data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics. That's about $57,000 in annual income, or what the LendingClub analysis considers a middle-income earner.

But monthly expenses can quickly gobble that up. For instance, median rent for a one-bedroom apartment is $1,510 per month, while U.S. households spend about $690 a month on food, including groceries and eating out, BLS data shows.

On top of that, the average monthly expenditure on travel, including car payments, gasoline and public transportation, is about $900. Health care is another $450 per month, BLS data shows.

Those basics alone add up to $3,550 per month — which already represents the bulk of a middle-income worker's pre-tax income.

The year-over-year increase in Americans who are living paycheck to paycheck "indicates that consumers are still feeling the weight of rising costs of living and remain tasked with managing and adjusting their cash flows to put aside savings," LendingClub said in the report.
[/b]

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/paycheck-to-paycheck-6-in-10-americans-lendingclub/
Americans also put out money every month on countless subscription services that we didn't have years ago. Everything from streaming TV to credit protection to microchipped pet tracking. All that adds up.
Then also factor in that most people don't use cash anymore and are swiping cards all day long. Spending isn't as based on what you know you have as it used to be.
Just as an example: what was spent in vending machines at your place of work used to be based on what was left in your pocket for the week. Not anymore, people just swipe the cards or tap the phone all day long.
And order from Amazon non stop with the same mindset.

I have a nephew in his early 30s, does well for himself. But he spends in this manner without ever looking at his bank account.

It's a whole different world when it comes to spending and that greatly contributes to everyone living paycheck to paycheck.
trollslayer · 46-50, M
@robingoodfellow Yes, compared to 1980, we pay for streaming services, multiple phones, eat out more, travel more, and on and on. On the other hand, proportionally a TV costs less, so does a computer, and your car may cost more but lasts longer. This all evens out to some extent - but it is true that people spend more on leisure activities now than they did in the past - and they feel entitled to.

I think Ynotisay hits at a big problem, proportionally the wealth gap in the USA has gotten way out of control the past few decades, and this "trickles down" to paying employees only enough to cover their bills. Housing is a main reason why - many properties in a community are owned by fewer landowners who have the means of amassing capitol to outbid the average worker, who is then forced to pay rent to the person who already has much more money than them. I live in a community where soon it will be nearly impossible for young families to own property on a typical salary - and the #1 way people amass wealth in the USA is through real estate.
Ynotisay · M
What stood out to me was, " nonessential spending on items such as travel, eating out and streaming services, the analysis found."
So people would be better off if they a has a much lesser quality of life. Perfect.
In my opinion it can all be traced to the overwhelming wealth disparity in the country. The rules are set up for the rich to get richer. Trickle down, right?
Elon Muck makes roughly $37,000 a MINUTE.
That's legal and encouraged.
And it shouldn't be.
Yup. Y'all spend tons more money keeping yourselves poor than it might cost to have a decent life. And yet you hate me, a communist, so much that for the Americans in control, conservatives, it's well worth it. I'm loving it for you.
TrashCat · M
Explain the 2019 statistics
TrashCat · M
@Theyitis He wont make it 😃
Theyitis · 36-40, M
@TrashCat I wish you could convince me of that. His lead over Biden in the RCP poll average is currently 1.4% and growing; this time four years ago Biden was up by 6.3%, and he barely squeaked out an electoral college win. That’s a 7.7% turnaround! Furthermore, 55% of voters think Trump’s presidency was a success, whereas 61% of voters think Biden’s presidency has been a failure.

You might say there’s still lots of time until the election. Well, there’s enough time that those numbers will most likely change a little bit, but we’re actually close enough now that historically those numbers aren’t going to change by a lot. There’s a very high probability that the popular vote will fall within a 3% radius of the current RCP polling average. So somewhere between Biden +1.6 and Trump +4.4. So, optimistically, will winning the popular vote by 1.6% be enough to put Biden over 269 in the electoral college? I don’t think you can say with 100% confidence that it won’t be, but I sure as hell wouldn’t want to bet on it! The situation is not yet hopeless, but I’d say it’s extremely dire.

And the narrative that Democrats have overperformed lately isn’t going to save us. Democrats have overperformed [i]expectations[/i] set by history and by the media, but we have [i]not overperformed the polls[/i]! The polls have been pretty accurate lately, and pollsters are constantly making adjustments to their methodology to correct for recent errors. So there’s no reason to think the polls are going to be off by a lot, and they’re just as likely to overestimate Biden as they are to underestimate him. Like I said, extremely dire!
Theyitis · 36-40, M
@TrashCat Come on man, at least [i]try[/i] to convince me I’m wrong, I don’t want to be right about this!
TexChik · F
And creepy Joe, the provider of this debacle, wants us to endure 4 more years of this and worse.

 
Post Comment