Linewriting punishment, repetition
I have rejected Edwards first set of lines of April 24th/25th for the following reasons:
* your lines differ in length dramatically (compare the length of # 1 and #2). For a nice tidy look, you are to make sure your words form columns, i.e. every word being exactly below the same word in the other lines. Of course, you are not allowed to _write_ them in columns. you write them line by line.
* When underlining a word, e.g. my name, letters decending below the baseline should not be underlined, so that the line and the letter will not cross. In your sentences, the "g" in "Miss Meghan" should not have been underlined. Now look at "lazy". It does not look neat.
* Furthermore the line should keep a little distance (about half a millimetre) from the letters. Compare "careless" in # 24 (good) and
# 23 (not good).
* you have written in haste - with unfortunate consequences. The comma,
for instance is per definitionem _on_ the auxilary line. Now look at
# 32, 33, 35, 39: The comma is well _below_ that line.
Do you believe his new set of lines is acceptable?
[image][image][image][image][image][image][image][image]
* your lines differ in length dramatically (compare the length of # 1 and #2). For a nice tidy look, you are to make sure your words form columns, i.e. every word being exactly below the same word in the other lines. Of course, you are not allowed to _write_ them in columns. you write them line by line.
* When underlining a word, e.g. my name, letters decending below the baseline should not be underlined, so that the line and the letter will not cross. In your sentences, the "g" in "Miss Meghan" should not have been underlined. Now look at "lazy". It does not look neat.
* Furthermore the line should keep a little distance (about half a millimetre) from the letters. Compare "careless" in # 24 (good) and
# 23 (not good).
* you have written in haste - with unfortunate consequences. The comma,
for instance is per definitionem _on_ the auxilary line. Now look at
# 32, 33, 35, 39: The comma is well _below_ that line.
Do you believe his new set of lines is acceptable?
[image][image][image][image][image][image][image][image]
46-50, F
