Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »
Top | Newest First | Oldest First
MarkPaul · 26-30, M
Not if you can't spell it.
4meAndyou · F
They would have to prove a crime. And I would say that the idea of indicting a former president of the United States would upset a LOT of people. A lot of very rabid extremist people.
hippyjoe1955 · 61-69, M
I suspect he can be if it can be shown that he knowingly initiated a spying/disinformation operation against a presidential candidate.
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
SW-User
Probably not.
Whatever happened while he was in office would probably fall under executive immunity
BlueVeins · 22-25
@SW-User I'm pretty sure executive priviledge ends when you relinquish the office.
curiosi · 61-69, F
To indite the messiah it would have to be very serious and then there would definitely be a civil war.
Heartlander · 80-89, M
A jury conviction in a criminal case takes a unanimous decision by a jury of 12, and an unbiased judge to oversee the trial, and an unbiased court of appeals, and an unbiased prosecutor, and an unbiased media not wanting to put their hand on scale of justice.

The chances of all of the above in a case against a high profile politician still loved by so many is about ZERO.

OJ Simpson only had some of the above and the jury treated him as a victim of malicious prosecution.

 
Post Comment