Top | Newest First | Oldest First
NakedExperiment · 51-55, M
I don't see gods as any more likely than abiogenesis. If you say something was created by something else, you just get the whole "Well how did that creative force come about...". It doesn't answer anything.
TheGoodGuy · M
newjaninev2 · 56-60, F
You say that abiogenesis is "scientifically impossible", but you don't say why that should be so (incidentally, I'm not sure what the difference would be between 'impossible' and 'scientifically impossible')
You also say that abiogenesis contradicts science, but again you don't say why that should be so.
You say "The only way...", but you don't demonstrate why that is the only way.
You also say that abiogenesis contradicts science, but again you don't say why that should be so.
You say "The only way...", but you don't demonstrate why that is the only way.
@newjaninev2 Haha that's a long chain of research you'll have to do yourself.
@newjaninev2 It's evident,especially if you are a biology student.
Subsumedpat · 36-40, M
It is the most likely explanation one which science will replicate eventually just like someone somewhere sometime even though it is illegal will make a human from scratch.
It is hard to understand but I think it was chemical, billions of years ago and probably occurred around heated water like a geothermal vent.
It is hard to understand but I think it was chemical, billions of years ago and probably occurred around heated water like a geothermal vent.