Only logged in members can reply and interact with the post.
Join SimilarWorlds for FREE »

Which is worse: starving children or abused animals?

SW-User
They are both bad. Yes a human being is more important...by far...but they are both living creatures that have feelings and suffer pain!
SW-User
I totally agree
SW-User
I feel more sympathy to human children :( so it's starving children...even though animal abuse breaks my heart too.
SweetMae · 70-79, F
Starving children. But It's very hard to know an animal is being abused. Both are defenseless.
SW-User
You've got a point!
SW-User
Abused animals. You're going into the conscious effort to hurt them
SW-User
I thought you're more likely to suffer from your conscience if you hurt either of them?
Bastard · 26-30, M
Both but animals don't have a voice.
SW-User
So you're more about animals right?
SW-User
starving kids.
SW-User
Why did you choose this option over the other?
SW-User
@Alex1610: species loyalty. same reasons if there was a car coming down the road and I could only get a puppy or a baby out of the street. the kids have more of a capacity to continue on and improve the world so starving kids and abused animals don't happen anymore than the abused animal will.
SW-User
@malcontent: Good example
sarabee1995 · 26-30, F
Well both are horrible of course, but if I had to choose which is worse, I'd go with the kids.
SerenitiesScars · 31-35, M
Starving kids, hands down... Not even a contest..
[c=#BF0080]I agree.. I'm kinda surprised by the answers.[/c]
SerenitiesScars · 31-35, M
🙄 With answers like that how are we ever supposed to progress as a society... If we can stop the hurting of people I'm pretty sure animal abuse would follow suit... But choosing that other answer as the path would never result in anything positive... Just a continued cycle...

Plus when you know how animals view humans it's hard to completely feel sorry for them... I admire seagulls and crows til I remember how often they'll peck out babies eyes if given the opportunity..

Animals also don't have as advanced as a nervous system as ours.. which is why they can survive such cruelty and accomplish amazing feats despite what ould leave a human too forlorn to hope to survive with.. A starving child would feel 10x as much pain as the animal would..
SW-User
They're both bad. I can't stand to see either one.
SW-User
Neither can I
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
SW-User
Why?
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
SW-User
Why is it worse than the other one?
SW-User
Neither are acceptable
SW-User
Yep
SW-User
Can't really choose
SW-User
So can't I. They're both equally bad to me
SW-User
They're both horrible :(
SW-User
I know
IM5688 · 61-69, M
I think they are equally bad, neither one can truly defend themselves or help themselves.
SW-User
I couldn't agree more
GoldenWorm · 51-55, M
Starving kids but, like oppression olympics, it's not a very helpful question.
SW-User
It was never a helpful question
ADCxoDPC · 36-40, F
Abused animals. There are enough whiny brats as it is.
SW-User
Ok, but shhhhh...you might piss someone off lol
Serenitree · F
There is no better, so they are both worst.

Jan. 8/17
8:24 pm
SW-User
I think so too
[c=#BF0080]Starving children.[/c]
SW-User
What makes starving children worse than abused animals imo?
SW-User
@Alex1610: I think for me it comes down to species loyalty.
@Alex1610: [c=#BF0080]Because they're humans who are well aware of what's going on.. and I have kids and it breaks my heart literally to see any child going hungry.[/c]
MikefromEP · 51-55, M
Abused animals
SW-User
Why is that worse than the other one?
MikefromEP · 51-55, M
@Alex1610: Abusing others becomes a fetish when those doing it are comfortable. Starving children do not have that choice
SW-User
@MikefromEP: Fetish???
starving children since we raised them
SW-User
Such cruel parents....
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
SW-User
@MalteseFalconPunch: So you think the starving children are worse because they could be beneficial for the society?
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
sighmeupforthat · 46-50, M
Both should be unnecessary.
SW-User
What?
Invisible · 26-30, M
Starving children
SW-User
How come?
Invisible · 26-30, M
More good can come from nourishing children than saving the animals
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
SW-User
Why?
This comment is hidden. Show Comment
SW-User
abuse is abuse
SW-User
So you're saying they're equally in pain?
SW-User
depends on how long the kids were starving for. kids and animals are the same thing to me. life is life.
SW-User
What makes it worse than the other one?
LivAbit · 46-50, M
SW-User
How come?
LivAbit · 46-50, M
@Alex1610: As humans, we value human life above animal life. We can love an animal, but not like a child. I hate the thought of any animal being abused or hungry. The law doesn't place the same value on human and animal life. I Can kill a deer, or a cow, or a fish legally. Human life however, is held sacred.
SW-User
SW-User
Me too
Spitbak · 56-60, M
"EQUAL! They're both a cause of great inner pain!"

 
Post Comment