@Jackjjacksonjr: It appears to be on a downward trajectory, but it's still in business. Maybe they'll see an investment in a fact-based news operation as a way of improving their image.
@Burnley123: that title doesn't line up with the subject matter being strictly factual. However some day in the life of documented cultural marxists might save some interest for some views. I don't Sweeney that as a first episode. The first episode must be dynamic to hoo, the viewers. Segments of Princess Di facts, JFK and RFK assasination fscts, moon landing facts and UFO/moon landing facts should do it. The tricky part will be finding still living witnesses.
@Burnley123: thanks for illustrating the theme that is the exact opposite of the program I am putting together. Viewers won't be told those things either directly or indirectly. What they view may or may not result In viewers forming those opinions or thr exact opposite. Try to get your head around this I know it's a novel concept 👌🏼
@katielass: so for based on the number of responses I see to what he posts doesn't look like he's getting very far. I haven't seen anything unlikable about him. Maybe he tries too hard?
Could be. The format is here are the things we know from at least two verifiable independent sources. We don't suggest any conclusions. We may consider posting viewer responses. That part is still in the development phase.
